Bryant 190 2005 boat specs
Bryant
Bryant 190 2005
2005
View full specs →
VS
Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012 boat specs
Bryant
Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012
2012
View full specs →

Bryant 190 2005 vs Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Bryant 190 2005 vs Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012 measures 23,3 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 5,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Bryant 190 2005 at 18,0 feet (2005). At 276 lbs and 367 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 320 hp, the Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012 has a 315-hp advantage over the Bryant 190 2005's 5-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012 carries 46 gallons versus 31 gallons in the Bryant 190 2005. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

The Bryant 190 2005 is rated for up to 5 people. Passenger data for the Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012 wasn't available.

Bottom line: The Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012 at 23,3 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Bryant 190 2005 at 18,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeBryant
MakeBryant
Model19
Model233 Cuddy Cabin
Model Year2005
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in. (8 ft. 0 in.)
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise17℃
Deadrise19℃ at transom
Draft [drive up] - Detail13 in
Draft [drive up] - Detail18 in
Draft [drive up] meters0.33
Draft [drive up] meters0.46
Draft [drive up] inches13
Draft [drive up] inches18
Draft [max] - Detail27 in
Draft [max] - Detail32 in
Draft [max] - Meters0.69
Draft [max] - Meters0.81
Draft [max] - Inches27
Draft [max] - Inches32
Weight - Detail2,760 lbs
Weight - Detail3,670 lbs
Weight - kg1251.91
Weight - kg1664.68
Weight - lbs.276
Weight - lbs.367
Height - Detail79 in. (6 ft. 7 in.) w/Trailer
Height - Detail7 ft. 4 in. with trailer
Height - Meters2.01
Height - Meters2.24
Height - Inches79
Height - Inches88
Length - Feet18
Length - Feet23.25
Length - Inches11
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 11 in
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Meters5.77
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Inches227
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Length [over all with swim platform]not available
Length [over all with swim platform]23 ft. 3 in
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standard3.0 l
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail31 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail46 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters117.35
Fuel tank capacity - Liters174.13
Fuel tank capacity - Gal31
Fuel tank capacity - Gal46
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Engine max5.0 l
Engine max320 hp
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercury MerCruiser or Volvo Penta
Engine modelnot available
Engine modelMercury: 5.0 L MPI EC Alpha with catalyst, 260 hp OR Volvo: 5.0 GXIC/SX with catalyst, 270 hp
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Operational Info
Water capacitynot available
Water capacity13 gal
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailShoreland'r, tandem axle, brakes on 1 axle

Bryant 190 2005 vs Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Bryant 190 2005 or the Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012?
The Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012 is the longer of the two at 23,3 feet overall. The Bryant 190 2005 comes in at 18,0 feet, making it roughly 5,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Bryant 190 2005 or the Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012?
For trailering, the Bryant 190 2005 has the edge at 276 lbs dry weight versus 367 lbs for the Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012 is rated to a maximum of 320 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Bryant 190 2005 tops out at 5 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many passengers can the Bryant 190 2005 carry?
The Bryant 190 2005 has an official capacity rating of 5 people. Capacity data wasn't available for the other model in this comparison — verify directly with the dealer.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012 measures 102" wide, compared to 96" for the Bryant 190 2005. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Bryant 190 2005 or the Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012?
The Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012 has the bigger tank at 46 gallons, versus 31 gallons on the Bryant 190 2005. That 15-gallon difference translates to roughly 45–75 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Bryant 190 2005 and Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Bryant 190 2005 and the Bryant 233 Cuddy Cabin 2012 are built by Bryant. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.