Matching a tunnel Blue Wave 1900 STL 2012 against a modified vee Blue Wave 2200 Pure Bay 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Blue Wave 1900 STL 2012 at 19,0 ft versus Blue Wave 2200 Pure Bay 2010 at 21,3 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Blue Wave 1900 STL 2012 tips the scales at 1 395 lbs — 1 378 lbs more than the Blue Wave 2200 Pure Bay 2010 at 17 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Blue Wave 2200 Pure Bay 2010 has a 75-hp advantage over the Blue Wave 1900 STL 2012's 150-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 3 gal and 6 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Blue Wave 2200 Pure Bay 2010 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Blue Wave 1900 STL 2012 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Blue Wave 2200 Pure Bay 2010 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Blue Wave 2200 Pure Bay 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 21,3 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Blue Wave 1900 STL 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.