The Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2012 vs Blue Wave 190 C Special 2004 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2012 at 16,6 ft versus Blue Wave 190 C Special 2004 at 18,0 ft. At 85 lbs and 11 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Blue Wave 190 C Special 2004 has a 70-hp advantage over the Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2012's 80-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Blue Wave 190 C Special 2004 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2012 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Blue Wave 190 C Special 2004 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Blue Wave 190 C Special 2004 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Blue Wave 190 C Special 2004 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 18,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.