Matching a tunnel Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2011 against a modified vee Blue Wave 1900 VLC (2008) 2007 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2011 at 16,6 ft versus Blue Wave 1900 VLC (2008) 2007 at 18,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Blue Wave 1900 VLC (2008) 2007 tips the scales at 1 175 lbs — 1 090 lbs less than the Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2011 at 85 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Blue Wave 1900 VLC (2008) 2007 has a 35-hp advantage over the Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2011's 80-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Blue Wave 1900 VLC (2008) 2007 carries 37 gallons versus 18 gallons in the Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2011 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the Blue Wave 1900 VLC (2008) 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.