The Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2006 vs Blue Wave 1900 VLC 2009 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2006 at 16,0 ft versus Blue Wave 1900 VLC 2009 at 18,6 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Blue Wave 1900 VLC 2009 tips the scales at 1 175 lbs — 1 090 lbs less than the Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2006 at 85 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Blue Wave 1900 VLC 2009 has a 35-hp advantage over the Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2006's 80-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Blue Wave 1900 VLC 2009 carries 37 gallons versus 18 gallons in the Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2006. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: The Blue Wave 1900 VLC 2009 at 18,6 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Blue Wave 170 Super Tunnel 2006 at 16,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.