Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 boat specs
Bennington
Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013 boat specs
Bennington
Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013
2013
View full specs →

Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 vs Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013 — A Close Look at Two Pontoons

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 and the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013 are pontoon designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 at 31,1 ft versus Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013 at 31,1 ft. At 4 262 lbs and 4 262 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 425 hp for the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 and 430 hp for the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 carries 62 gallons versus 59 gallons in the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 16 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

One place where both boats are genuinely identical is tube construction: both run 3 aluminum tubes at 25" diameter. That shared spec means stability and buoyancy characteristics are closely matched — the ride difference you'll feel between them comes primarily from deck length, weight distribution, and motor choice.

Bottom line: The Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 and Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeBennington
MakeBennington
Model2874 RCW I/O
Model2874 RCW I/O
Model Year2012
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches102
Weight - Detail4,262 lbs
Weight - Detail4,262 lbs
Weight - kg1933.21
Weight - kg1933.21
Weight - lbs.4262
Weight - lbs.4262
Length [at waterline]25 ft. 6 in. pontoon length
Length [at waterline]28 ft. 6 in. pontoon length
Length [deck]28 ft. 6 in
Length [deck]27 ft. 11 in
Length - Feet31.08
Length - Feet31.08
Length overall - Detail31 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Detail31 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Meters9.47
Length overall - Meters9.47
Length overall - Inches373
Length overall - Inches373
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typePontoon
Hull typePontoon
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter25 in. outside, 32 in. center
Tube diameter25 in. outside, 32 in. center
Tube gauge0.090 in. outside, 0.100 in. center
Tube gauge0.100 / 0.125
Number of tubes3
Number of tubes3
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail62 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail58.7 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters234.7
Fuel tank capacity - Liters223.34
Fuel tank capacity - Gal62
Fuel tank capacity - Gal58.7
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeI/O
Engine max425 hp
Engine max430 hp
Operational Info
Maximum people16
Maximum people16

Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 vs Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 or the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013?
The Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013 is the longer of the two at 31,1 feet overall. The Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 comes in at 31,1 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 or the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013?
For trailering, the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013 has the edge at 4 262 lbs dry weight versus 4 262 lbs for the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 16 passengers, while the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013 is certified for 16. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 and Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013 share an 8 ft. 6 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 or the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013?
The Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 has the bigger tank at 62 gallons, versus 59 gallons on the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013. That 3-gallon difference translates to roughly 9–16 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 and Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2012 and the Bennington 2874 RCW I/O 2013 are built by Bennington. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.