Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010 boat specs
Bennington
Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010 boat specs
Bennington
Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010
2010
View full specs →

Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010 vs Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010 — A Close Look at Two Pontoons

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010 and the Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010 are pontoon designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010 at 27,2 ft versus Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010 at 27,2 ft. At 3 648 lbs and 3 648 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 425 hp, the Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010 has a 105-hp advantage over the Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010's 320-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 62 gal and 62 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 13 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

One place where both boats are genuinely identical is tube construction: both run 3 aluminum tubes at 2" diameter. That shared spec means stability and buoyancy characteristics are closely matched — the ride difference you'll feel between them comes primarily from deck length, weight distribution, and motor choice.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010 and its 425-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010 with its 320-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeBennington
MakeBennington
Model25753RCW I/O
Model25753RFS I/O
Model Year201
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches102
Weight - Detail3,648 lbs
Weight - Detail3,648 lbs
Weight - kg1654.7
Weight - kg1654.7
Weight - lbs.3648
Weight - lbs.3648
Length [deck]24 ft. 11 in
Length [deck]24 ft. 11 in
Length - Feet27.17
Length - Feet27.17
Length overall - Detail27 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Detail27 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Meters8.28
Length overall - Meters8.28
Length overall - Inches326
Length overall - Inches326
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.125 in
Hull thickness0.125 in
Hull typePontoon
Hull typePontoon
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter(2) 25 in. (1) 32 in. center
Tube diameter(2) 25 in. (1) 32 in. center
Tube gauge0.090 in. 0.100 in. elliptical
Tube gauge0.090 in. 0.100 in. elliptical
Number of tubes3
Number of tubes3
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail62 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail62 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters234.7
Fuel tank capacity - Liters234.7
Fuel tank capacity - Gal62
Fuel tank capacity - Gal62
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Engine max320 hp
Engine max425 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,870 lbs
Maximum capacity1,870 lbs
Maximum people13
Maximum people13

Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010 vs Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010 or the Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010?
The Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010 is the longer of the two at 27,2 feet overall. The Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010 comes in at 27,2 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010 or the Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010?
For trailering, the Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010 has the edge at 3 648 lbs dry weight versus 3 648 lbs for the Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010 is rated to a maximum of 425 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010 tops out at 320 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 13 passengers, while the Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010 is certified for 13. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010 and Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010 share an 8 ft. 6 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010 and Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 62 gallons and 62 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010 and Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Bennington 25753RCW I/O 2010 and the Bennington 25753RFS I/O 2010 are built by Bennington. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.