Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 boat specs
Bennington
Bennington 2574 RFS 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Bennington 2574RLi 2009 boat specs
Bennington
Bennington 2574RLi 2009
2009
View full specs →

Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 vs Bennington 2574RLi 2009 — A Close Look at Two Pontoons

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 and the Bennington 2574RLi 2009 are pontoon designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 at 27,1 ft versus Bennington 2574RLi 2009 at 25,0 ft. At 3 298 lbs and 3 223 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 has a 148-hp advantage over the Bennington 2574RLi 2009's 2-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 is rated for 25 passengers, while the Bennington 2574RLi 2009 caps at 2. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 25 passengers and at 27,1 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Bennington 2574RLi 2009 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 2 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeBennington
MakeBennington
Model2574 RFS
Model2574RLi
Model Year2013
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches102
Weight - Detail25 in. Tubes: 2,932 lbs. ESP Performance Package: 3,298 lbs. 32 in. Elliptical Tubes: 3,020 lbs
Weight - DetailWith 2 Tubes: 2,649 lbs. With 3 Tubes: 3,123 - 3,223 lbs
Weight - kg1495.95
Weight - kg1461.93
Weight - lbs.3298
Weight - lbs.3223
Length [at waterline]25 ft. 6 in. pontoon length
Length [at waterline]not available
Length [deck]24 ft. 11 in
Length [deck]24 ft. 11 in
Length - Feet27.08
Length - Feet25
Length overall - Detail27 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Detail25 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters8.26
Length overall - Meters7.77
Length overall - Inches325
Length overall - Inches306
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches6
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typePontoon
Hull typePontoon
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter25 in. 32 in. elliptical ESP Performance Package: 25 in. outside, 32 in. center
Tube diameter25 in
Tube gauge25 in. Tubes: 0.090 32 in. Elliptical Tubes: 0.100 ESP Peformance Package: 0.090 / 0.1
Tube gauge0.09 in
Number of tubes25 & 32 in. Tubes: 2 ESP Performance Package: 3
Number of tubes2 or 3
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail31.1 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters117.35
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal31.1
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max150 hp ESP Performance Package: 350 hp
Engine maxWith 2 Tubes: 150 hp With 3 Tubes: 225 - 300 hp
Operational Info
Maximum people25 in. Tubes: 13 ESP Performance Package: 16 32 in. Elliptical Tubes: 15
Maximum peopleWith 2 Tubes: 13 With 3 Tubes: 14
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacityWith 2 Tubes: 1,810 lbs. With 3 Tubes: 2,050 lbs

Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 vs Bennington 2574RLi 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 or the Bennington 2574RLi 2009?
The Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 is the longer of the two at 27,1 feet overall. The Bennington 2574RLi 2009 comes in at 25,0 feet, making it roughly 2,1 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 or the Bennington 2574RLi 2009?
For trailering, the Bennington 2574RLi 2009 has the edge at 3 223 lbs dry weight versus 3 298 lbs for the Bennington 2574 RFS 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Bennington 2574RLi 2009 tops out at 2 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 25 passengers, while the Bennington 2574RLi 2009 is certified for 2. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 and Bennington 2574RLi 2009 share an 8 ft. 6 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Are the Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 and Bennington 2574RLi 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Bennington 2574 RFS 2013 and the Bennington 2574RLi 2009 are built by Bennington. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.