The Bennington 2250 EF 2007 vs Bennington 2275 RLIO3 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story: intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Bennington 2250 EF 2007 at 22,0 ft versus Bennington 2275 RLIO3 2007 at 22,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Bennington 2275 RLIO3 2007 tips the scales at 2 890 lbs - 646 lbs less than the Bennington 2250 EF 2007 at 2 244 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The Bennington 2250 EF 2007 carries a rated maximum of 150 hp. Engine data for the Bennington 2275 RLIO3 2007 wasn't available in our records - check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Bennington 2275 RLIO3 2007 carries 62 gallons versus 26 gallons in the Bennington 2250 EF 2007. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Bennington 2275 RLIO3 2007 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Bennington 2250 EF 2007 caps at 11. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Bennington 2275 RLIO3 2007 could be the deciding factor.
Both are inflatable designs, which means they pack down for compact storage, can be carried in a bag, and are dramatically lighter than equivalent rigid hulls. The trade-off is setup time and the need to monitor tube pressure regularly.
Bottom line: Choose the Bennington 2275 RLIO3 2007 if your priority is putting more people on the water - it handles 12 passengers and at 22,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Bennington 2250 EF 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 11 that costs less to run day-to-day.