Bennington 2050SF 2009 boat specs
Bennington
Bennington 2050SF 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Bennington 2075RLi 2009 boat specs
Bennington
Bennington 2075RLi 2009
2009
View full specs →

Bennington 2050SF 2009 vs Bennington 2075RLi 2009 — A Close Look at Two Pontoons

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Bennington 2050SF 2009 and the Bennington 2075RLi 2009 are pontoon designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Bennington 2050SF 2009 at 2,0 ft versus Bennington 2075RLi 2009 at 2,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Bennington 2075RLi 2009 tips the scales at 2 553 lbs — 808 lbs less than the Bennington 2050SF 2009 at 1 745 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 23 hp for the Bennington 2050SF 2009 and 23 hp for the Bennington 2075RLi 2009. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 23 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Bennington 2050SF 2009 comes in at 76 lbs per hp versus 111 lbs per hp for the Bennington 2075RLi 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Both are 2-tube and 23-tube pontoon designs respectively. Tube diameter and gauge affect stability and load capacity — more so than most buyers realize when comparing on paper.

Bottom line: The Bennington 2050SF 2009 and Bennington 2075RLi 2009 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeBennington
MakeBennington
Model2050SF
Model2075RLi
Model Year2009
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches102
Weight - DetailWith 23 in. Tubes: 1,670 lbs. With 25 in. Tubes: 1,745 lbs
Weight - DetailWith 23 in. Tubes: 2,144 lbs. With 25 in. Tubes: 2,194 lbs. With 3-25 in. Tubes: 2,553 lbs
Weight - kg791.52
Weight - kg1158.02
Weight - lbs.1745
Weight - lbs.2553
Length [deck]19 ft. 11 in
Length [deck]19 ft. 11 in
Length - Feet2
Length - Feet2
Length - Inches6
Length - Inches6
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters6.25
Length overall - Meters6.25
Length overall - Inches246
Length overall - Inches246
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typePontoon
Hull typePontoon
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter23 or 25 in
Tube diameter23 or 25 in
Tube gauge0.08 in
Tube gauge0.08 in
Number of tubes2
Number of tubes2 or 3
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine maxWith 23 in. Tubes: 90 hp With 25 in. Tubes: 115 hp
Engine maxWith 23 in. Tubes: 60 hp With 25 in. Tubes: 115 hp With 3-25 in. Tubes: 150 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacityWith 23 in. Tubes: 1,280 lbs. With 25 in. Tubes: 1,455 lbs
Maximum capacityWith 23 in. Tubes: 1,195 lbs. With 25 in. Tubes: 1,240 lbs. With 3-25 in. Tubes: 1,540 lbs
Maximum peopleWith 23 in. Tubes: 9 With 25 in. Tubes: 1
Maximum peopleWith 23 in. Tubes: 9 With 25 in. Tubes: 9 With 3-25 in. Tubes: 11

Bennington 2050SF 2009 vs Bennington 2075RLi 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Bennington 2050SF 2009 or the Bennington 2075RLi 2009?
The Bennington 2075RLi 2009 is the longer of the two at 2,0 feet overall. The Bennington 2050SF 2009 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Bennington 2050SF 2009 or the Bennington 2075RLi 2009?
For trailering, the Bennington 2050SF 2009 has the edge at 1 745 lbs dry weight versus 2 553 lbs for the Bennington 2075RLi 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Bennington 2050SF 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 23 passengers, while the Bennington 2075RLi 2009 is certified for 23. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Bennington 2050SF 2009 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 76 lbs per hp compared to 111 lbs per hp for the Bennington 2075RLi 2009. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Bennington 2050SF 2009 and Bennington 2075RLi 2009 share an 8 ft. 6 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Are the Bennington 2050SF 2009 and Bennington 2075RLi 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Bennington 2050SF 2009 and the Bennington 2075RLi 2009 are built by Bennington. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.