The Bennington 1650 GLi 2006 vs Bennington 2250 RFS 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Bennington 2250 RFS 2006 measures 22,0 feet overall (2006), giving it roughly 6,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Bennington 1650 GLi 2006 at 16,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Bennington 2250 RFS 2006 tips the scales at 2 335 lbs — 960 lbs less than the Bennington 1650 GLi 2006 at 1 375 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 50 hp, the Bennington 1650 GLi 2006 has a 25-hp advantage over the Bennington 2250 RFS 2006's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Bennington 2250 RFS 2006 carries 26 gallons versus 15 gallons in the Bennington 1650 GLi 2006. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Bennington 2250 RFS 2006 is rated for 14 passengers, while the Bennington 1650 GLi 2006 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Bennington 2250 RFS 2006 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Bennington 1650 GLi 2006 comes in at 28 lbs per hp versus 93 lbs per hp for the Bennington 2250 RFS 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Both are inflatable designs, which means they pack down for compact storage, can be carried in a bag, and are dramatically lighter than equivalent rigid hulls. The trade-off is setup time and the need to monitor tube pressure regularly. Tube diameter differs: 23 in on the Bennington 1650 GLi 2006 vs 25 in on the Bennington 2250 RFS 2006 — larger tubes generally mean more buoyancy and a drier, more stable ride.
Bottom line: Choose the Bennington 2250 RFS 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 14 passengers and at 22,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Bennington 1650 GLi 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.