Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 boat specs
Beneteau
Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008
2008
View full specs →
VS
Beneteau R/C 32 1980 boat specs
Beneteau
Beneteau R/C 32 1980
1980
View full specs →

Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 vs Beneteau R/C 32 1980 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 vs Beneteau R/C 32 1980 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 measures 41,0 feet overall (2008), giving it roughly 7,9 additional feet of deck space compared to the Beneteau R/C 32 1980 at 33,1 feet (1980). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 tips the scales at 17 196 lbs — 8 818 lbs more than the Beneteau R/C 32 1980 at 8 378 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Beneteau R/C 32 1980 tops out at 25 hp. Engine specs for the Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 carries 45 gallons versus 12 gallons in the Beneteau R/C 32 1980. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Beneteau R/C 32 1980 caps at 10. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 could be the deciding factor.

Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 displaces 17 196 lbs — a 8 818-lb difference over the Beneteau R/C 32 1980 at 8 378 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.

Both boats draw a similar depth — 4,8 ft and 4,5 ft respectively. Marina access and anchorage options should be broadly equivalent between the two.

The Beneteau R/C 32 1980 has a documented auxiliary engine of 25 hp.

For extended cruising, water capacity matters: the Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 carries 151 gallons versus 53 gallons on the Beneteau R/C 32 1980 — a significant advantage on longer passages where watermaker or provisioning stops aren't guaranteed.

Bottom line: The Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 17 196 lbs displacement and 41 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Beneteau R/C 32 1980 at 8 378 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail41.00 ft
Length overall - Detail33.11 ft
Length - Feet41
Length - Feet33.11
Length overall - Meters12.5
Length overall - Meters10.09
Length overall - Inches492
Length overall - Inches397
Beam13.00 ft
Beam11.10 ft
Beam - Meters3.96
Beam - Meters3.38
Beam - Inches156
Beam - Inches133
Draft [max] - Detail4.75 ft
Draft [max] - Detail4.50 ft
Draft [max] - Meters1.45
Draft [max] - Meters1.37
Draft [max] - Inches57
Draft [max] - Inches54
Displacement17196.00 lbs
Displacement8378.00 lbs
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal45
Fuel tank capacity - Gal11.9
Fuel tank capacity - Liters170.34
Fuel tank capacity - Liters45.05
Engine makeYanmar
Engine makenot available
Fuel typeDiesel
Fuel typeDiesel
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower25 hp
Drive typenot available
Drive typeinboard
Operational Info
Sleeping capacity6
Sleeping capacity5
Cabins3
Cabins2
Head2
Head1
Water capacity151
Water capacity52.8
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail
Riggingnot available
RiggingSloop
Mast Configurationnot available
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Body / Hull
Ruddernot available
Rudder1 spade rudder
Helmnot available
Helm1 tiller
Performance
Maximum speednot available
Maximum speed7.08
Maximum speed measurenot available
Maximum speed measureknots

Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 vs Beneteau R/C 32 1980 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 or the Beneteau R/C 32 1980?
The Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 is the longer of the two at 41,0 feet overall. The Beneteau R/C 32 1980 comes in at 33,1 feet, making it roughly 7,9 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 or the Beneteau R/C 32 1980?
For trailering, the Beneteau R/C 32 1980 has the edge at 8 378 lbs dry weight versus 17 196 lbs for the Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Beneteau R/C 32 1980 has a documented max rating of 25 hp. Engine specifications for the Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 is Coast Guard rated for 12 passengers, while the Beneteau R/C 32 1980 is certified for 10. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 or the Beneteau R/C 32 1980?
The Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 has the deeper draft at 4,8 ft, versus 4,5 ft for the Beneteau R/C 32 1980. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 or the Beneteau R/C 32 1980 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 at 17 196 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Beneteau R/C 32 1980 at 8 378 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Which boat is better equipped for long-distance cruising?
For extended passages, fresh water capacity is a key indicator of cruising readiness. The Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 carries 151 gallons of fresh water compared to 53 gallons on the Beneteau R/C 32 1980 — a meaningful advantage when watermaker installations or port stops aren't guaranteed.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 measures 156" wide, compared to 133" for the Beneteau R/C 32 1980. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 or the Beneteau R/C 32 1980?
The Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 has the bigger tank at 45 gallons, versus 12 gallons on the Beneteau R/C 32 1980. That 33-gallon difference translates to roughly 99–165 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 and Beneteau R/C 32 1980 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Beneteau Oceanis Clipper 411 2008 and the Beneteau R/C 32 1980 are built by Beneteau. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.