The Beneteau Evasion 22 1980 vs Beneteau Oceanis 400 1997 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Beneteau Oceanis 400 1997 measures 39,1 feet overall (1997), giving it roughly 17,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Beneteau Evasion 22 1980 at 22,1 feet (1980). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Beneteau Oceanis 400 1997 tips the scales at 16 001 lbs — 12 033 lbs less than the Beneteau Evasion 22 1980 at 3 968 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 50 hp, the Beneteau Oceanis 400 1997 has a 25-hp advantage over the Beneteau Evasion 22 1980's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Beneteau Oceanis 400 1997 is rated for 11 passengers, while the Beneteau Evasion 22 1980 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Beneteau Oceanis 400 1997 could be the deciding factor.
Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Beneteau Oceanis 400 1997 displaces 16 001 lbs — a 12 033-lb difference over the Beneteau Evasion 22 1980 at 3 968 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.
Draft is a practical consideration that many buyers underestimate until they're already at the marina. The Beneteau Oceanis 400 1997 draws 5,6 ft, compared to 3,4 ft for the Beneteau Evasion 22 1980. That 2,2-foot difference affects which anchorages you can access, which haul-out facilities will take you, and how carefully you need to read the tide tables in shallower cruising grounds.
The Beneteau Evasion 22 1980 uses Sloop rigging. Helm style differs too: the Beneteau Evasion 22 1980 uses a 1 tiller versus a 1 wheel on the Beneteau Oceanis 400 1997. Wheel helms give better leverage and visibility on larger boats; tillers offer direct feedback and simplicity on smaller ones. For auxiliary power the Beneteau Oceanis 400 1997 carries a 50-hp engine against 25 hp on the Beneteau Evasion 22 1980. Motoring range and ability to punch through a foul current or enter a tight marina under power will favour the more powerful installation.
Hull speed is rated at 7,9 knots for the Beneteau Oceanis 400 1997 and 5,9 knots for the Beneteau Evasion 22 1980.
Bottom line: The Beneteau Oceanis 400 1997 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 16 001 lbs displacement and 39 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Beneteau Evasion 22 1980 at 3 968 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.