Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 boat specs
Beneteau
Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 boat specs
Beneteau
Beneteau Figaro 2 2003
2003
View full specs →

Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 vs Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 vs Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 measures 43,5 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 10,1 additional feet of deck space compared to the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 at 33,4 feet (2003). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 tips the scales at 19 797 lbs — 11 860 lbs more than the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 at 7 937 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 54 hp, the Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 has a 34-hp advantage over the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003's 20-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 carries 53 gallons versus 11 gallons in the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 is rated for 13 passengers, while the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 caps at 10. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 could be the deciding factor.

Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 displaces 19 797 lbs — a 11 860-lb difference over the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 at 7 937 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.

Both boats draw a similar depth — 6,2 ft and 7,1 ft respectively. Marina access and anchorage options should be broadly equivalent between the two.

The Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 is rigged as a Fractional Sloop while the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 carries Sloop rigging — a meaningful difference in sail handling complexity, upwind performance, and the size of crew you'll need to work the boat comfortably. For auxiliary power the Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 carries a 54-hp engine against 20 hp on the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003. Motoring range and ability to punch through a foul current or enter a tight marina under power will favour the more powerful installation.

Bottom line: The Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 19 797 lbs displacement and 44 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 at 7 937 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail43.50 ft
Length overall - Detail33.40 ft
Length - Feet43.5
Length - Feet33.4
Length overall - Meters13.26
Length overall - Meters10.18
Length overall - Inches522
Length overall - Inches401
Beam14.53 ft
Beam11.40 ft
Beam - Meters4.43
Beam - Meters3.47
Beam - Inches174
Beam - Inches137
Draft [max] - Detail6.23 ft
Draft [max] - Detail7.10 ft
Draft [max] - Meters1.9
Draft [max] - Meters2.16
Draft [max] - Inches75
Draft [max] - Inches85
Displacement19797.00 lbs
Displacement7937.00 lbs
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal53
Fuel tank capacity - Gal10.6
Fuel tank capacity - Liters200.63
Fuel tank capacity - Liters40.13
Horsepower54 hp
Horsepower20 hp
Engine makenot available
Engine makeVolvo Penta
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeDiesel
Drive typenot available
Drive typeinboard
Operational Info
Water capacity14
Water capacitynot available
RiggingFractional Sloop
RiggingSloop
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail
Sleeping capacitynot available
Sleeping capacity4
Cabinsnot available
Cabins1
Headnot available
Head1
Mast Configurationnot available
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Body / Hull
Ruddernot available
Rudder2 spade rudders
Helmnot available
Helm1 tiller
Performance
Maximum speednot available
Maximum speed7.61
Maximum speed measurenot available
Maximum speed measureknots

Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 vs Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 or the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003?
The Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 is the longer of the two at 43,5 feet overall. The Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 comes in at 33,4 feet, making it roughly 10,1 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 or the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003?
For trailering, the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 has the edge at 7 937 lbs dry weight versus 19 797 lbs for the Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 is rated to a maximum of 54 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 tops out at 20 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 13 passengers, while the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 is certified for 10. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 or the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003?
The Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 has the deeper draft at 7,1 ft, versus 6,2 ft for the Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 or the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 at 19 797 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 at 7 937 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 measures 174" wide, compared to 137" for the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 or the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003?
The Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 has the bigger tank at 53 gallons, versus 11 gallons on the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003. That 42-gallon difference translates to roughly 127–212 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 and Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Beneteau Cyclades 43.3 2010 and the Beneteau Figaro 2 2003 are built by Beneteau. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.