Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 boat specs
Beneteau
Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005
2005
View full specs →
VS
Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 boat specs
Beneteau
Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987
1987
View full specs →

Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 vs Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 vs Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 at 30,0 ft versus Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 at 31,6 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 tips the scales at 9 523 lbs — 705 lbs more than the Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 at 8 818 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 260 hp, the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 has a 242-hp advantage over the Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987's 18-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 carries 106 gallons versus 13 gallons in the Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 9 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Both boats sit in a similar displacement bracket — 9 523 lbs for the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 and 8 818 lbs for the Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987. Comparable displacement means broadly similar seakeeping behaviour and load capacity, though hull form and ballast ratio will still produce noticeably different sailing characteristics.

Draft is a practical consideration that many buyers underestimate until they're already at the marina. The Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 draws 4,7 ft, compared to 2,7 ft for the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005. That 2,0-foot difference affects which anchorages you can access, which haul-out facilities will take you, and how carefully you need to read the tide tables in shallower cruising grounds.

For auxiliary power the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 carries a 260-hp engine against 18 hp on the Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987. Motoring range and ability to punch through a foul current or enter a tight marina under power will favour the more powerful installation.

For extended cruising, water capacity matters: the Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 carries 40 gallons versus 25 gallons on the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 — a significant advantage on longer passages where watermaker or provisioning stops aren't guaranteed.

Bottom line: The Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 and Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 are closely matched on paper. A sea trial on both in representative conditions is the only reliable way to find which one suits your sailing style, home port, and intended cruising ground.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail30.00 ft
Length overall - Detail31.60 ft
Length - Feet30
Length - Feet31.6
Length overall - Meters9.14
Length overall - Meters9.63
Length overall - Inches360
Length overall - Inches379
Beam10.17 ft
Beam10.80 ft
Beam - Meters3.1
Beam - Meters3.29
Beam - Inches122
Beam - Inches130
Draft [max] - Detail2.70 ft
Draft [max] - Detail4.70 ft
Draft [max] - Meters0.82
Draft [max] - Meters1.43
Draft [max] - Inches32
Draft [max] - Inches56
Displacement9523.00 lbs
Displacement8818.00 lbs
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal105.6
Fuel tank capacity - Gal13.2
Fuel tank capacity - Liters399.74
Fuel tank capacity - Liters49.97
Horsepower260 hp
Horsepower18 hp
Fuel typeDiesel
Fuel typeDiesel
Drive typeinboard
Drive typeinboard
Operational Info
Sleeping capacity5
Sleeping capacity4
Cabins2
Cabins2
Head1
Head1
Water capacity25
Water capacity39.6
Boat typePower
Boat typeSail
Riggingnot available
RiggingSloop
Mast Configurationnot available
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Body / Hull
Ruddernot available
Rudder1 spade rudder
Helmnot available
Helm1 tiller
Performance
Maximum speednot available
Maximum speed7.05
Maximum speed measurenot available
Maximum speed measureknots

Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 vs Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 or the Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987?
The Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 is the longer of the two at 31,6 feet overall. The Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 comes in at 30,0 feet, making it roughly 1,6 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 or the Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987?
For trailering, the Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 has the edge at 8 818 lbs dry weight versus 9 523 lbs for the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 is rated to a maximum of 260 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 tops out at 18 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 is Coast Guard rated for 9 passengers, while the Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 or the Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987?
The Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 has the deeper draft at 4,7 ft, versus 2,7 ft for the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 or the Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 at 9 523 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 at 8 818 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Which boat is better equipped for long-distance cruising?
For extended passages, fresh water capacity is a key indicator of cruising readiness. The Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 carries 40 gallons of fresh water compared to 25 gallons on the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 — a meaningful advantage when watermaker installations or port stops aren't guaranteed.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 measures 130" wide, compared to 122" for the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 or the Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987?
The Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 has the bigger tank at 106 gallons, versus 13 gallons on the Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987. That 92-gallon difference translates to roughly 277–461 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 and Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Beneteau Antares 9.80 2005 and the Beneteau Oceanis 320 1987 are built by Beneteau. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.