The Beneteau Antares 13.80 2008 vs Beneteau Oceanis 40 CC 1995 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
The Beneteau Oceanis 40 CC 1995 tops out at 50 hp. Engine specs for the Beneteau Antares 13.80 2008 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Beneteau Antares 13.80 2008 carries 396 gallons versus 53 gallons in the Beneteau Oceanis 40 CC 1995. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Beneteau Antares 13.80 2008 is rated for 13 passengers, while the Beneteau Oceanis 40 CC 1995 caps at 12. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Beneteau Antares 13.80 2008 could be the deciding factor.
The Beneteau Oceanis 40 CC 1995 has a documented displacement of 18 739 lbs. Displacement data wasn't available for the other boat in this comparison.
Draft is a practical consideration that many buyers underestimate until they're already at the marina. The Beneteau Oceanis 40 CC 1995 draws 5,7 ft, compared to 3,0 ft for the Beneteau Antares 13.80 2008. That 2,7-foot difference affects which anchorages you can access, which haul-out facilities will take you, and how carefully you need to read the tide tables in shallower cruising grounds.
The Beneteau Oceanis 40 CC 1995 has a documented auxiliary engine of 50 hp.
For extended cruising, water capacity matters: the Beneteau Antares 13.80 2008 carries 169 gallons versus 132 gallons on the Beneteau Oceanis 40 CC 1995 — a significant advantage on longer passages where watermaker or provisioning stops aren't guaranteed.
Bottom line: The Beneteau Antares 13.80 2008 at 45,0 ft offers more living space, greater range, and a more substantial offshore capability. The Beneteau Oceanis 40 CC 1995 at 41,0 ft is the easier, lower-cost option — simpler to crew and a strong choice for coastal and day sailing.