Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 boat specs
Beneteau
Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005
2005
View full specs →
VS
Beneteau R/C 27 1978 boat specs
Beneteau
Beneteau R/C 27 1978
1978
View full specs →

Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 vs Beneteau R/C 27 1978 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 vs Beneteau R/C 27 1978 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 measures 34,0 feet overall (2005), giving it roughly 6,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Beneteau R/C 27 1978 at 27,7 feet (1978). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 tips the scales at 9 965 lbs — 4 674 lbs more than the Beneteau R/C 27 1978 at 5 291 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 21 hp for the Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 and 16 hp for the Beneteau R/C 27 1978. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 carries 20 gallons versus 7 gallons in the Beneteau R/C 27 1978. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 is rated for 10 passengers, while the Beneteau R/C 27 1978 caps at 8. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 could be the deciding factor.

Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 displaces 9 965 lbs — a 4 674-lb difference over the Beneteau R/C 27 1978 at 5 291 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.

Draft is a practical consideration that many buyers underestimate until they're already at the marina. The Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 draws 6,7 ft, compared to 5,1 ft for the Beneteau R/C 27 1978. That 1,6-foot difference affects which anchorages you can access, which haul-out facilities will take you, and how carefully you need to read the tide tables in shallower cruising grounds.

The Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 uses Sloop rigging. Helm style differs too: the Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 uses a 1 wheel versus a 1 tiller on the Beneteau R/C 27 1978. Wheel helms give better leverage and visibility on larger boats; tillers offer direct feedback and simplicity on smaller ones.

Hull speed is rated at 7,2 knots for the Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 and 6,2 knots for the Beneteau R/C 27 1978.

Bottom line: The Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 9 965 lbs displacement and 34 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Beneteau R/C 27 1978 at 5 291 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail34.00 ft
Length overall - Detail27.70 ft
Length - Feet34
Length - Feet27.7
Length overall - Meters10.36
Length overall - Meters8.44
Length overall - Inches408
Length overall - Inches332
Beam11.10 ft
Beam9.10 ft
Beam - Meters3.38
Beam - Meters2.77
Beam - Inches133
Beam - Inches109
Draft [max] - Detail6.70 ft
Draft [max] - Detail5.10 ft
Draft [max] - Meters2.04
Draft [max] - Meters1.55
Draft [max] - Inches80
Draft [max] - Inches61
Displacement9965.00 lbs
Displacement5291.00 lbs
Draft Minnot available
Draft Min4.50 ft
Body / Hull
Rudder1 spade rudder
Rudder1 spade rudder
Helm1 wheel
Helm1 tiller
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19.8
Fuel tank capacity - Gal6.6
Fuel tank capacity - Liters74.95
Fuel tank capacity - Liters24.98
Horsepower21 hp
Horsepower16 hp
Fuel typeDiesel
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeinboard
Drive typeoutboard
Performance
Maximum speed7.17
Maximum speed6.21
Maximum speed measureknots
Maximum speed measureknots
Operational Info
Sleeping capacity5
Sleeping capacity3
Cabins1
Cabins1
Head1
Head1
Water capacity26.4
Water capacity23.8
RiggingSloop
RiggingSloop
Mast ConfigurationKeel stepped mast
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail

Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 vs Beneteau R/C 27 1978 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 or the Beneteau R/C 27 1978?
The Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 is the longer of the two at 34,0 feet overall. The Beneteau R/C 27 1978 comes in at 27,7 feet, making it roughly 6,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 or the Beneteau R/C 27 1978?
For trailering, the Beneteau R/C 27 1978 has the edge at 5 291 lbs dry weight versus 9 965 lbs for the Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 is Coast Guard rated for 10 passengers, while the Beneteau R/C 27 1978 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 or the Beneteau R/C 27 1978?
The Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 has the deeper draft at 6,7 ft, versus 5,1 ft for the Beneteau R/C 27 1978. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 or the Beneteau R/C 27 1978 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 at 9 965 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Beneteau R/C 27 1978 at 5 291 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Which is the faster sailboat — the Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 or the Beneteau R/C 27 1978?
Based on rated hull speed, the Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 has an edge at 7,2 knots versus 6,2 knots for the Beneteau R/C 27 1978. Keep in mind that actual sailing speed depends heavily on wind conditions, sail trim, bottom condition, and skipper experience — hull speed is a theoretical maximum, not a guarantee.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 measures 133" wide, compared to 109" for the Beneteau R/C 27 1978. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 or the Beneteau R/C 27 1978?
The Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 has the bigger tank at 20 gallons, versus 7 gallons on the Beneteau R/C 27 1978. That 13-gallon difference translates to roughly 39–66 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 and Beneteau R/C 27 1978 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Beneteau 34.7 Deep draft 2005 and the Beneteau R/C 27 1978 are built by Beneteau. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.