Detailed Evaluation & Buyer Recommendation
Bayliner 275 2006 vs Bayliner 289 Classic 2006 — Same Brand, Different Boat
The Bayliner 275 2006 vs Bayliner 289 Classic 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Bayliner 275 2006 at 26,0 ft versus Bayliner 289 Classic 2006 at 27,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Bayliner 289 Classic 2006 tips the scales at 7 597 lbs — 6 962 lbs less than the Bayliner 275 2006 at 635 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 320 hp for the Bayliner 275 2006 and 300 hp for the Bayliner 289 Classic 2006. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Bayliner 289 Classic 2006 carries 102 gallons versus 77 gallons in the Bayliner 275 2006. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Bayliner 275 2006 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Bayliner 289 Classic 2006 caps at 1. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Bayliner 275 2006 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Bayliner 275 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 26,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Bayliner 289 Classic 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 1 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
Model Year2006
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam9 ft. 5 in. (2.87 m)
Beam9 ft. 9 in. (2.97 m)
Beam - Meters2.87
Beam - Meters2.97
Beam - Inches113
Beam - Inches117
Bridge clearance - Detail7 ft. 3 in. (2.21 m)
Bridge clearance - Detail9 ft. 1 in. (2.77 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.21
Bridge clearance - Meters2.77
Bridge clearance - Inches87
Bridge clearance - Inches109
Deadrise16℃
Deadrise15℃
Draft [drive up] - DetailHull: 1 ft. 9 in. (.53 m)
Draft [drive up] - DetailHull: 1 ft. 7 in. (.48 m)
Draft [drive up] meters0.53
Draft [drive up] meters0.48
Draft [drive up] inches21
Draft [drive up] inches19
Draft [max] - Detail3 ft. 2 in. (.97 m)
Draft [max] - Detail3 ft. 0 in. (.91 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.97
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Inches38
Draft [max] - Inches36
Weight - Detail6,350 lbs. (2,880 kg)
Weight - Detail7,597 lbs. (3,446 kg)
Weight - kg2880.31
Weight - kg3445.94
Weight - lbs.635
Weight - lbs.7597
Length - Meters8.1
Length - Meters8.46
Length - Feet26
Length - Feet27
Length - Inches7
Length - Inches9
Length overall - Detail26 ft. 7 in. (8.10 m) Rigged: 27 ft. 5 in. (8.36 m)
Length overall - Detail27 ft. 9 in. (8.46 m) Rigged: 30 ft. 0 in. (9.14 m)
Length overall - Meters8.36
Length overall - Meters9.14
Length overall - Inches329
Length overall - Inches36
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standard5.7 l MerCruiser? Bravo? III (250 hp)
Engine/s standard350 MAG MPI MerCruiser? Bravo? II (300 hp)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail77 gal. (291 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail102 gal. (386 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters291.48
Fuel tank capacity - Liters386.11
Fuel tank capacity - Gal77
Fuel tank capacity - Gal102
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Engine max320 hp
Engine max300 hp
Operational Info
Sleeping capacity6
Sleeping capacity6
Water capacity31 gal. (117.3 l)
Water capacity36 gal. (136 l)
Maximum people12
Maximum people1
Holding tank capacity - Detail20 gal. (75.7 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail30 gal. (113.6 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters75.71
Holding tank capacity - Liters113.56
Holding tank capacity - Gal2
Holding tank capacity - Gal3