Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013 boat specs
Bayliner
Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012 boat specs
Bayliner
Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012
2012
View full specs →

Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013 vs Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013 against a deep vee Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012 measures 24,1 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 5,1 additional feet of deck space compared to the Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013 at 19,0 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012 tips the scales at 546 lbs — 244 lbs less than the Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013 at 302 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 24,1 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeBayliner
MakeBayliner
Model195 Bowrider
Model245 Cruiser
Model Year2013
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 11 in. (2.41 m)
Beam8 ft. 5 in. (2.57 m)
Beam - Meters2.41
Beam - Meters2.57
Beam - Inches95
Beam - Inches101
Bridge clearance - Detail4 ft. 1 in. (1.24 m) 7 ft. 1 in. (2.16 m) max
Bridge clearance - Detail6 ft. 9 in. (2.06 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.16
Bridge clearance - Meters2.06
Bridge clearance - Inches85
Bridge clearance - Inches81
Deadrise19°
Deadrise16°
Draft [drive up] - Detail1 ft. 10 in. (0.56 m)
Draft [drive up] - Detail1 ft. 5 in. (0.43 m)
Draft [drive up] meters0.56
Draft [drive up] meters0.43
Draft [drive up] inches22
Draft [drive up] inches17
Draft [max] - Detail3 ft. 3 in. (0.99 m)
Draft [max] - Detail2 ft. 9 in. (0.84 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.99
Draft [max] - Meters0.84
Draft [max] - Inches39
Draft [max] - Inches33
Weight - Detail3,020 lbs. (1,370 kg)
Weight - Detail5,460 lbs. (2,477 kg)
Weight - kg1369.85
Weight - kg2476.61
Weight - lbs.302
Weight - lbs.546
Length - Feet19
Length - Feet24.08
Length overall - Detail19 ft. (5.79 m)
Length overall - Detail24 ft. 1 in. (7.34 m) 25 ft. 7 in. (7.8 m) rigged
Length overall - Meters5.79
Length overall - Meters7.8
Length overall - Inches228
Length overall - Inches307
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine makeMercury
Engine makeMercury
Engine modelMPI / A1 (4.3 l) ECT Carb compliant
Engine modelMPI / B3 (5.0 L) ECT Carb Compliant
Engine/s standard220 hp
Engine/s standard260 hp
Fuel tank capacity - Detail35 gal. (132.5 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail64 gal. (242 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters132.49
Fuel tank capacity - Liters242.27
Fuel tank capacity - Gal35
Fuel tank capacity - Gal64
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Operational Info
Water capacitynot available
Water capacity20 gal. (75.7 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail20 gal. (75.7 l)
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters75.71
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal2

Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013 vs Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013 or the Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012?
The Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012 is the longer of the two at 24,1 feet overall. The Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013 comes in at 19,0 feet, making it roughly 5,1 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013 or the Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012?
For trailering, the Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013 has the edge at 302 lbs dry weight versus 546 lbs for the Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012 measures 101" wide, compared to 95" for the Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013 or the Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012?
The Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012 has the bigger tank at 64 gallons, versus 35 gallons on the Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013. That 29-gallon difference translates to roughly 87–145 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013 and Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Bayliner 195 Bowrider 2013 and the Bayliner 245 Cruiser 2012 are built by Bayliner. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.