Bayliner 192 Classic 2004 boat specs
Bayliner
Bayliner 192 Classic 2004
2004
View full specs →
VS
Bayliner 235 BR 2011 boat specs
Bayliner
Bayliner 235 BR 2011
2011
View full specs →

Bayliner 192 Classic 2004 vs Bayliner 235 BR 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Bayliner 192 Classic 2004 vs Bayliner 235 BR 2011 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

The Bayliner 235 BR 2011 tops out at 300 hp. Engine specs for the Bayliner 192 Classic 2004 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Bayliner 192 Classic 2004 carries 23 gallons versus 5 gallons in the Bayliner 235 BR 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Bayliner 235 BR 2011 is rated for 11 passengers, while the Bayliner 192 Classic 2004 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Bayliner 235 BR 2011 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Bayliner 235 BR 2011 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 11 passengers and at 22,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Bayliner 192 Classic 2004 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeBayliner
MakeBayliner
Model192 Classic
Model235 BR
Model Year2004
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 7 in
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters2.31
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches91
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise18℃
Deadrise21°
Draft [max] - Detail2 ft. 10 in. max
Draft [max] - Detail3 ft. 0 in. (0.91 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.86
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Inches34
Draft [max] - Inches36
Weight - Detail2,175 lbs
Weight - Detail3,750 lbs. (1,701 kg)
Weight - kg986.56
Weight - kg1700.97
Weight - lbs.2175
Weight - lbs.375
Height - Detail7 ft. 3 in. (rigged)
Height - Detail8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m) rigged
Height - Meters2.21
Height - Meters2.59
Height - Inches87
Height - Inches102
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 6 in. (6.86 m)
Length overall - Meters5.72
Length overall - Meters6.86
Length overall - Inches225
Length overall - Inches27
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Detail8 ft. 4 in. (2.54 m)
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters2.54
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches1
Draft [drive up] - Detailnot available
Draft [drive up] - Detail1 ft. 6 in. (0.46 m)
Draft [drive up] metersnot available
Draft [drive up] meters0.46
Draft [drive up] inchesnot available
Draft [drive up] inches18
Length - Feetnot available
Length - Feet22.5
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail23 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail50 gal. (189.3 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters87.06
Fuel tank capacity - Liters189.27
Fuel tank capacity - Gal23
Fuel tank capacity - Gal5
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercury
Engine modelnot available
Engine modelMerCruiser
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standard260 hp
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeI/O
Engine maxnot available
Engine max300 hp
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailPainted or Galvanized, Single-Axle w/Brakes, Tongue Jack & Swing-Away Tongue
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Heightnot available
Trailer - Height8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over all26 ft. 10 in. (8.18 m)
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Weight4,692 lbs. (2,129 kg) with boat and engine
Trailer - Widthnot available
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeDeep Vee
Operational Info
Water capacitynot available
Water capacity10 gal. (37.9 l)
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people11

Bayliner 192 Classic 2004 vs Bayliner 235 BR 2011 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Bayliner 192 Classic 2004 or the Bayliner 235 BR 2011?
For trailering, the Bayliner 235 BR 2011 has the edge at 375 lbs dry weight versus 2 175 lbs for the Bayliner 192 Classic 2004. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Bayliner 235 BR 2011 has a documented max rating of 300 hp. Engine specifications for the Bayliner 192 Classic 2004 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Bayliner 192 Classic 2004 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Bayliner 235 BR 2011 is certified for 11. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Bayliner 235 BR 2011 measures 102" wide, compared to 91" for the Bayliner 192 Classic 2004. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Bayliner 192 Classic 2004 or the Bayliner 235 BR 2011?
The Bayliner 192 Classic 2004 has the bigger tank at 23 gallons, versus 5 gallons on the Bayliner 235 BR 2011. That 18-gallon difference translates to roughly 54–90 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Bayliner 192 Classic 2004 and Bayliner 235 BR 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Bayliner 192 Classic 2004 and the Bayliner 235 BR 2011 are built by Bayliner. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.