Detailed Evaluation & Buyer Recommendation
Bayliner 175 BR 2012 vs Bayliner 215 BR 2012 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees
When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Bayliner 175 BR 2012 and the Bayliner 215 BR 2012 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Bayliner 175 BR 2012 at 17,5 ft versus Bayliner 215 BR 2012 at 20,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Bayliner 215 BR 2012 tips the scales at 3 044 lbs — 1 121 lbs less than the Bayliner 175 BR 2012 at 1 923 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 260 hp, the Bayliner 215 BR 2012 has a 125-hp advantage over the Bayliner 175 BR 2012's 135-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Bayliner 215 BR 2012 carries 37 gallons versus 21 gallons in the Bayliner 175 BR 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Bayliner 215 BR 2012 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Bayliner 175 BR 2012 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Bayliner 215 BR 2012 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Bayliner 215 BR 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 20,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Bayliner 175 BR 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
Model Year2012
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam6 ft. 11 in. (2.11 m)
Beam8 ft. 2 in. (2.43 m)
Beam - Meters2.11
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Inches83
Beam - Inches98
Bridge clearance - Detail2 ft. 11.375 in. (0.90 m) 6 ft. 3.5 in. (1.92) max
Bridge clearance - Detail3 ft. 11 in. (1.19 m) 7 ft. 1 in. (2.16 m) max
Bridge clearance - Meters1.93
Bridge clearance - Meters2.16
Bridge clearance - Inches75.5
Bridge clearance - Inches85
Deadrise19°
Deadrise20°
Draft [drive up] - Detail1 ft. 7.625 in. (0.50 m)
Draft [drive up] - Detail1 ft. 8 in. (0.51 m)
Draft [drive up] meters0.51
Draft [drive up] meters0.51
Draft [drive up] inches19.625
Draft [drive up] inches2
Draft [max] - Detail2 ft. 11.75 in. (0.91 m)
Draft [max] - Detail3 ft. 1 in. (0.94 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Meters0.94
Draft [max] - Inches35.75
Draft [max] - Inches37
Weight - Detail1,923 lbs (872 kg)
Weight - Detail3,044 lbs. (1,381 kg)
Weight - kg872.26
Weight - kg1380.73
Weight - lbs.1923
Weight - lbs.3044
Length - Feet17.5
Length - Feet20.5
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in. (5.33 m)
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 6 in. (6.25 m)
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Meters6.25
Length overall - Inches21
Length overall - Inches246
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine makeMercury
Engine makeMercury
Engine modelMPI / A1 (3.0 L) WPS ECT
Engine modelMPI / A1 (4.3 L) ECT Carb Compliant
Engine/s standard135 hp
Engine/s standard220 hp
Fuel tank capacity - Detail21 gal. (79.5 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail37 gal. (140 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters79.49
Fuel tank capacity - Liters140.06
Fuel tank capacity - Gal21
Fuel tank capacity - Gal37
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Engine max135 hp
Engine max260 hp