Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013 boat specs
Bayliner
Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Bayliner 194 Classic 2006 boat specs
Bayliner
Bayliner 194 Classic 2006
2006
View full specs →

Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013 vs Bayliner 194 Classic 2006 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013 vs Bayliner 194 Classic 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013 at 17,5 ft versus Bayliner 194 Classic 2006 at 18,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013 tips the scales at 1 753 lbs — 1 732 lbs more than the Bayliner 194 Classic 2006 at 21 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Bayliner 194 Classic 2006 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Bayliner 194 Classic 2006 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Bayliner 194 Classic 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 18,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeBayliner
MakeBayliner
Model170 Bowrider
Model194 Classic
Model Year2013
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam6 ft. 11 in. (2.11 m)
Beam7 ft. 7 in. (2.31 m)
Beam - Meters2.11
Beam - Meters2.31
Beam - Inches83
Beam - Inches91
Bridge clearance - Detail3 ft. 2.5 in. (0.98 m) 6 ft. 6.63 in. (2 m) max
Bridge clearance - Detail3 ft. 1 in. (.94 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.01
Bridge clearance - Meters0.94
Bridge clearance - Inches78.63
Bridge clearance - Inches37
Deadrise19°
Deadrise18℃
Draft [drive up] - Detail1 ft. 5.5 in. (0.44 m)
Draft [drive up] - DetailHull: 1 ft. 5 in. (.43 m)
Draft [drive up] meters0.46
Draft [drive up] meters0.43
Draft [drive up] inches17.5
Draft [drive up] inches17
Draft [max] - Detail2 ft. 11 in. (0.89 m)
Draft [max] - Detail2 ft. 10 in. (.86 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.89
Draft [max] - Meters0.86
Draft [max] - Inches35
Draft [max] - Inches34
Weight - Detail1,753 lbs. (795 kg)
Weight - Detail2,100 lbs. (953 kg)
Weight - kg795.15
Weight - kg952.54
Weight - lbs.1753
Weight - lbs.21
Length - Feet17.5
Length - Feet18
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in. (5.33 m)
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 9 in. (5.72 m) Rigged: 20 ft. 8 in. (6.30 m)
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Meters6.3
Length overall - Inches21
Length overall - Inches248
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters5.72
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches9
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialnot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine makeMercury
Engine makenot available
Engine modelOptiMax DFI
Engine modelnot available
Engine/s standard90 hp
Engine/s standard3.0 l MerCruiser? Alpha I (135 hp)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail21 gal. (79.5 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail23 gal. (87 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters79.49
Fuel tank capacity - Liters87.06
Fuel tank capacity - Gal21
Fuel tank capacity - Gal23
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeI/O
Operational Info
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people7
Trailer Info
Trailer - Heightnot available
Trailer - Height6 ft. 8 in. (2.03 m)
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over allStorage Length (Tongue Swung to Side): 21 ft. 4 in. (6.50 m) Rigged: 23 ft. 0 in. (7.01 m)
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Weight2,750 lbs. (1,247 kg)
Trailer - Widthnot available
Trailer - Width8 ft. 1 in. (2.46 m)

Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013 vs Bayliner 194 Classic 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013 or the Bayliner 194 Classic 2006?
The Bayliner 194 Classic 2006 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013 comes in at 17,5 feet, making it roughly 0,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013 or the Bayliner 194 Classic 2006?
For trailering, the Bayliner 194 Classic 2006 has the edge at 21 lbs dry weight versus 1 753 lbs for the Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Bayliner 194 Classic 2006 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Bayliner 194 Classic 2006 measures 91" wide, compared to 83" for the Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013 and Bayliner 194 Classic 2006?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 21 gallons and 23 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013 and Bayliner 194 Classic 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Bayliner 170 Bowrider 2013 and the Bayliner 194 Classic 2006 are built by Bayliner. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.