Matching a modified vee Bayliner 160 OB 2011 against a tri-hull Bayliner Element 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Bayliner 160 OB 2011 at 16,2 ft versus Bayliner Element 2013 at 16,2 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Bayliner 160 OB 2011 tips the scales at 1 332 lbs — 1 175 lbs more than the Bayliner Element 2013 at 157 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Bayliner 160 OB 2011 has a 30-hp advantage over the Bayliner Element 2013's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Bayliner 160 OB 2011 carries 18 gallons versus 12 gallons in the Bayliner Element 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Bayliner Element 2013 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Bayliner 160 OB 2011 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Bayliner Element 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Bayliner Element 2013 comes in at 3 lbs per hp versus 15 lbs per hp for the Bayliner 160 OB 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.