Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 boat specs
Bayliner
Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Bayliner 192 Classic 2006 boat specs
Bayliner
Bayliner 192 Classic 2006
2006
View full specs →

Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 vs Bayliner 192 Classic 2006 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 vs Bayliner 192 Classic 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 at 16,2 ft versus Bayliner 192 Classic 2006 at 18,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Bayliner 192 Classic 2006 tips the scales at 2 175 lbs — 843 lbs less than the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 at 1 332 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Bayliner 192 Classic 2006 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Bayliner 192 Classic 2006 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Bayliner 192 Classic 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 18,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeBayliner
MakeBayliner
Model160 Bowrider
Model192 Classic
Model Year2013
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 2 in. (2.18 m)
Beam7 ft. 7 in. (2.31 m)
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Meters2.31
Beam - Inches86
Beam - Inches91
Bridge clearance - Detail3 ft. 5 in. (1.04 m)
Bridge clearance - Detail3 ft. 8 in. (1.12 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters1.04
Bridge clearance - Meters1.12
Bridge clearance - Inches41
Bridge clearance - Inches44
Deadrise16°
Deadrise18℃
Draft [drive up] - Detail1 ft. 2 in. (0.36 m)
Draft [drive up] - DetailHull: 1 ft. 5 in. (.43 m)
Draft [drive up] meters0.36
Draft [drive up] meters0.43
Draft [drive up] inches14
Draft [drive up] inches17
Draft [max] - Detail2 ft. 7 in. (0.79 m)
Draft [max] - Detail2 ft. 10 in. (.86 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Meters0.86
Draft [max] - Inches31
Draft [max] - Inches34
Weight - Detail1,332 lbs. (604 kg)
Weight - Detail2,175 lbs. (987 kg)
Weight - kg604.18
Weight - kg986.56
Weight - lbs.1332
Weight - lbs.2175
Length - Feet16.17
Length - Feet18
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 2 in. (4.93 m)
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 9 in. (5.72 m) Rigged: 20 ft. 8 in. (6.30 m)
Length overall - Meters4.93
Length overall - Meters6.3
Length overall - Inches194
Length overall - Inches248
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters5.72
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches9
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialnot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine makeMercury
Engine makenot available
Engine model4-stroke EFI
Engine modelnot available
Engine/s standard60 hp
Engine/s standard3.0 l MerCruiser? Alpha I (135 hp)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail18 gal. (68 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail23 gal. (87 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters68.14
Fuel tank capacity - Liters87.06
Fuel tank capacity - Gal18
Fuel tank capacity - Gal23
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeInboard
Operational Info
Maximum people5
Maximum people7
Trailer Info
Trailer - Heightnot available
Trailer - Height7 ft. 3 in. (2.21 m)
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over all20 ft. 8 in. (6.30 m) Storage (Tongue Swung to Side: 21 ft. 4 in. (6.50 m)
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Weight2,775 lbs. (1,259 kg)
Trailer - Widthnot available
Trailer - Width8 ft. 1 in. (2.46 m)

Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 vs Bayliner 192 Classic 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 or the Bayliner 192 Classic 2006?
The Bayliner 192 Classic 2006 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 comes in at 16,2 feet, making it roughly 1,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 or the Bayliner 192 Classic 2006?
For trailering, the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 has the edge at 1 332 lbs dry weight versus 2 175 lbs for the Bayliner 192 Classic 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Bayliner 192 Classic 2006 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Bayliner 192 Classic 2006 measures 91" wide, compared to 86" for the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 or the Bayliner 192 Classic 2006?
The Bayliner 192 Classic 2006 has the bigger tank at 23 gallons, versus 18 gallons on the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013. That 5-gallon difference translates to roughly 15–25 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 and Bayliner 192 Classic 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 and the Bayliner 192 Classic 2006 are built by Bayliner. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.