Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 boat specs
Bayliner
Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Bayliner 170 OB 2012 boat specs
Bayliner
Bayliner 170 OB 2012
2012
View full specs →

Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 vs Bayliner 170 OB 2012 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 and the Bayliner 170 OB 2012 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 at 16,2 ft versus Bayliner 170 OB 2012 at 17,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Bayliner 170 OB 2012 tips the scales at 1 753 lbs — 421 lbs less than the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 at 1 332 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Bayliner 170 OB 2012 tops out at 125 hp. Engine specs for the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 18 gal and 21 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 and Bayliner 170 OB 2012 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeBayliner
MakeBayliner
Model160 Bowrider
Model170 OB
Model Year2013
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 2 in. (2.18 m)
Beam6 ft. 11 in. (2.11 m)
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Meters2.11
Beam - Inches86
Beam - Inches83
Bridge clearance - Detail3 ft. 5 in. (1.04 m)
Bridge clearance - Detail3 ft. 2.5 in. (0.98 m) 6 ft. 6.63 in. (2 m) max
Bridge clearance - Meters1.04
Bridge clearance - Meters2.01
Bridge clearance - Inches41
Bridge clearance - Inches78.63
Deadrise16°
Deadrise19°
Draft [drive up] - Detail1 ft. 2 in. (0.36 m)
Draft [drive up] - Detail1 ft. 5.5 in. (0.44 m)
Draft [drive up] meters0.36
Draft [drive up] meters0.46
Draft [drive up] inches14
Draft [drive up] inches17.5
Draft [max] - Detail2 ft. 7 in. (0.79 m)
Draft [max] - Detail2 ft. 11 in. (0.89 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Meters0.89
Draft [max] - Inches31
Draft [max] - Inches35
Weight - Detail1,332 lbs. (604 kg)
Weight - Detail1,753 lbs. (795 kg)
Weight - kg604.18
Weight - kg795.15
Weight - lbs.1332
Weight - lbs.1753
Length - Feet16.17
Length - Feet17.5
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 2 in. (4.93 m)
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in. (5.33 m)
Length overall - Meters4.93
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Inches194
Length overall - Inches21
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine makeMercury
Engine makeMercury
Engine model4-stroke EFI
Engine modelOptiMax DFI
Engine/s standard60 hp
Engine/s standard90 hp
Fuel tank capacity - Detail18 gal. (68 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail21 gal. (79.5 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters68.14
Fuel tank capacity - Liters79.49
Fuel tank capacity - Gal18
Fuel tank capacity - Gal21
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine maxnot available
Engine max125 hp
Operational Info
Maximum people5
Maximum peoplenot available

Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 vs Bayliner 170 OB 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 or the Bayliner 170 OB 2012?
The Bayliner 170 OB 2012 is the longer of the two at 17,5 feet overall. The Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 comes in at 16,2 feet, making it roughly 1,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 or the Bayliner 170 OB 2012?
For trailering, the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 has the edge at 1 332 lbs dry weight versus 1 753 lbs for the Bayliner 170 OB 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Bayliner 170 OB 2012 has a documented max rating of 125 hp. Engine specifications for the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Bayliner 170 OB 2012 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 measures 86" wide, compared to 83" for the Bayliner 170 OB 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 or the Bayliner 170 OB 2012?
The Bayliner 170 OB 2012 has the bigger tank at 21 gallons, versus 18 gallons on the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013. That 3-gallon difference translates to roughly 9–15 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 and Bayliner 170 OB 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Bayliner 160 Bowrider 2013 and the Bayliner 170 OB 2012 are built by Bayliner. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.