The Bass Cat Puma 2006 vs Bass Cat Puma FTD 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Bass Cat Puma FTD 2013 measures 20,3 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 18,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Bass Cat Puma 2006 at 2,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Bass Cat Puma FTD 2013 tips the scales at 1 825 lbs — 1 808 lbs less than the Bass Cat Puma 2006 at 17 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 285 hp, the Bass Cat Puma 2006 has a 85-hp advantage over the Bass Cat Puma FTD 2013's 200-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 52 gal and 52 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: The Bass Cat Puma FTD 2013 at 20,3 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Bass Cat Puma 2006 at 2,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.