Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 boat specs
Azimut Yachts
Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013 boat specs
Azimut Yachts
Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013
2013
View full specs →

Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 vs Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 vs Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 at 54,0 ft versus Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013 at 55,6 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013 tips the scales at 67 902 lbs — 17 202 lbs less than the Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 at 50 700 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 715 hp, the Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 has a 215-hp advantage over the Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013's 500-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013 carries 845 gallons versus 533 gallons in the Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 16 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 and its 715-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013 with its 500-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail54.00 ft
Length overall - Detail55.60 ft
Length - Feet54
Length - Feet55.6
Length overall - Meters16.46
Length overall - Meters16.95
Length overall - Inches648
Length overall - Inches667
Beam14.00 ft
Beam15.60 ft
Beam - Meters4.27
Beam - Meters4.75
Beam - Inches168
Beam - Inches187
Draft [max] - Detail4.10 ft
Draft [max] - Detail4.90 ft
Draft [max] - Meters1.25
Draft [max] - Meters1.49
Draft [max] - Inches49
Draft [max] - Inches59
Displacement50700.00 lbs
Displacement67902.38 lbs
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal533.17
Fuel tank capacity - Gal845.3
Fuel tank capacity - Liters2018.27
Fuel tank capacity - Liters3199.81
Engine makeCaterpillar
Engine makeCummins
Horsepower715 hp
Horsepower500 hp
Drive typeinboard
Drive typenot available
Engine 2 Engine MakeCaterpillar
Engine 2 Engine MakeCummins
Engine 2 Horsepower715 hp
Engine 2 Horsepower500 hp
Engine 2 Drive Typeinboard
Engine 2 Drive Typenot available
Engine modelnot available
Engine modelQSB 8.3
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeDiesel
Engine 2 Engine Modelnot available
Engine 2 Engine ModelQSB 8.3
Engine 2 Fuel Typenot available
Engine 2 Fuel TypeDiesel
Operational Info
Sleeping capacity3
Sleeping capacity7
Cabins3
Cabins5
Head3
Head2
Water capacity132
Water capacity184.9
Boat typePower
Boat typePower
Performance
Cruising speednot available
Cruising speed16
Cruising speed measurenot available
Cruising speed measureknots
Maximum speednot available
Maximum speed22
Maximum speed measurenot available
Maximum speed measureknots

Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 vs Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 or the Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013?
The Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013 is the longer of the two at 55,6 feet overall. The Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 comes in at 54,0 feet, making it roughly 1,6 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 or the Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013?
For trailering, the Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 has the edge at 50 700 lbs dry weight versus 67 902 lbs for the Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 is rated to a maximum of 715 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013 tops out at 500 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 16 passengers, while the Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013 is certified for 16. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013 measures 187" wide, compared to 168" for the Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 or the Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013?
The Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013 has the bigger tank at 845 gallons, versus 533 gallons on the Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009. That 312-gallon difference translates to roughly 936–1560 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 and Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Azimut Yachts 50 Fly 2009 and the Azimut Yachts Magellano 53 2013 are built by Azimut Yachts. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.