Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 boat specs
Avalon
Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 boat specs
Avalon
Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011
2011
View full specs →

Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 vs Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 vs Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 measures 26,0 feet overall (2011), giving it roughly 4,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 at 22,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 tips the scales at 3 125 lbs — 2 952 lbs less than the Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 at 173 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 300 hp, the Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 has a 200-hp advantage over the Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006's 100-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 carries 42 gallons versus 24 gallons in the Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 is rated for 17 passengers, while the Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 caps at 12. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 17 passengers and at 26,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 12 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeAvalon
MakeAvalon
ModelCW Rear Fish - 22 Foot
ModelWindjammer Sandbar
Model Year2006
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Weight - Detailw/ furniture: 1,730 lbs
Weight - Detail3,125 lbs
Weight - kg784.71
Weight - kg1417.48
Weight - lbs.173
Weight - lbs.3125
Width [transom] - DetailDeck: 8 ft
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Length [deck]22 ft
Length [deck]not available
Length - Feet22
Length - Feet26
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail26 ft
Length overall - Meters6.71
Length overall - Meters7.92
Length overall - Inches264
Length overall - Inches312
Beamnot available
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam - Metersnot available
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inchesnot available
Beam - Inches102
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter23 in
Tube diameter25 in
Number of tubesnot available
Number of tubes3
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail42 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Liters158.99
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Fuel tank capacity - Gal42
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max100 hp
Engine maxnot available
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower300 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity2,350 lbs
Maximum capacity3,200 lbs
Maximum people12
Maximum people17 / 2,400 lbs
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typenot available
Hull typePontoon

Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 vs Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 or the Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011?
The Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 is the longer of the two at 26,0 feet overall. The Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 comes in at 22,0 feet, making it roughly 4,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 or the Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011?
For trailering, the Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 has the edge at 173 lbs dry weight versus 3 125 lbs for the Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 is rated to a maximum of 300 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 tops out at 100 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 12 passengers, while the Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 is certified for 17. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 or the Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011?
The Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 has the bigger tank at 42 gallons, versus 24 gallons on the Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006. That 18-gallon difference translates to roughly 54–90 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 and Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Avalon CW Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 and the Avalon Windjammer Sandbar 2011 are built by Avalon. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.