The Avalon CW RC Rear Fish - 24 Foot 2007 vs Avalon Excalibur - 23 Foot 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Avalon CW RC Rear Fish - 24 Foot 2007 at 24,0 ft versus Avalon Excalibur - 23 Foot 2006 at 23,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Avalon CW RC Rear Fish - 24 Foot 2007 tips the scales at 2 035 lbs — 1 850 lbs more than the Avalon Excalibur - 23 Foot 2006 at 185 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 135 hp for the Avalon CW RC Rear Fish - 24 Foot 2007 and 125 hp for the Avalon Excalibur - 23 Foot 2006. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Avalon Excalibur - 23 Foot 2006 carries 36 gallons versus 24 gallons in the Avalon CW RC Rear Fish - 24 Foot 2007. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Avalon CW RC Rear Fish - 24 Foot 2007 is rated for 16 passengers, while the Avalon Excalibur - 23 Foot 2006 caps at 14. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Avalon CW RC Rear Fish - 24 Foot 2007 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Avalon CW RC Rear Fish - 24 Foot 2007 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 16 passengers and at 24,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Avalon Excalibur - 23 Foot 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 14 that costs less to run day-to-day.