The Avalon CT Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 vs Avalon Windjammer 18 ft. 2010 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Avalon CT Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 measures 22,0 feet overall (2006), giving it roughly 4,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Avalon Windjammer 18 ft. 2010 at 18,0 feet (2010). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Avalon CT Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 tips the scales at 173 lbs — 157 lbs more than the Avalon Windjammer 18 ft. 2010 at 16 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 100 hp, the Avalon CT Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 has a 25-hp advantage over the Avalon Windjammer 18 ft. 2010's 75-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Avalon CT Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Avalon Windjammer 18 ft. 2010 caps at 8. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Avalon CT Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Avalon CT Rear Fish - 22 Foot 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 22,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Avalon Windjammer 18 ft. 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 8 that costs less to run day-to-day.