The Angler 173F 2006 vs Angler 220WA 2012 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Angler 220WA 2012 measures 22,0 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 5,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Angler 173F 2006 at 17,0 feet (2006). At 12 lbs and 27 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 300 hp, the Angler 220WA 2012 has a 210-hp advantage over the Angler 173F 2006's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Angler 220WA 2012 carries 12 gallons versus 3 gallons in the Angler 173F 2006. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Angler 220WA 2012 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Angler 173F 2006 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Angler 220WA 2012 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Angler 220WA 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 22,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Angler 173F 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.