Angler 173 Bay 2011 boat specs
Angler
Angler 173 Bay 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
Angler 173F 2012 boat specs
Angler
Angler 173F 2012
2012
View full specs →

Angler 173 Bay 2011 vs Angler 173F 2012 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Angler 173 Bay 2011 and the Angler 173F 2012 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Angler 173 Bay 2011 at 17,3 ft versus Angler 173F 2012 at 17,3 ft. At 12 lbs and 12 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 115 hp for the Angler 173 Bay 2011 and 115 hp for the Angler 173F 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 3 gal and 3 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Angler 173F 2012 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 0 lbs per hp for the Angler 173 Bay 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Angler 173 Bay 2011 and Angler 173F 2012 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeAngler
MakeAngler
Model173 Bay
Model173F
Model Year2011
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 5 in. (2.26 m)
Beam7 ft. 5 in. (2.26 m)
Beam - Meters2.26
Beam - Meters2.26
Beam - Inches89
Beam - Inches89
Deadrise15°
Deadrise15℃
Draft [max] - Detail9 in. (0.23 m)
Draft [max] - Detail9 in. (0.23 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.23
Draft [max] - Meters0.23
Draft [max] - Inches9
Draft [max] - Inches9
Weight - Detail1,200 lbs. (544.3 kg)
Weight - Detail1,200 lbs. (544.3 kg)
Weight - kg544.31
Weight - kg544.31
Weight - lbs.12
Weight - lbs.12
Height [transom]20 in. (0.51 m)
Height [transom]20 in. (0.51 m)
Length - Feet17.25
Length - Feet17.25
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 3 in. (5.26 m)
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 3 in. (5.26 m)
Length overall - Meters5.26
Length overall - Meters5.26
Length overall - Inches207
Length overall - Inches207
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail30 gal. (113.6 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail30 gal. (113.6 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters113.56
Fuel tank capacity - Liters113.56
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max115 hp (85.8 kW)
Engine max115 hp (85.7 kW)

Angler 173 Bay 2011 vs Angler 173F 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Angler 173 Bay 2011 or the Angler 173F 2012?
The Angler 173F 2012 is the longer of the two at 17,3 feet overall. The Angler 173 Bay 2011 comes in at 17,3 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Angler 173 Bay 2011 or the Angler 173F 2012?
For trailering, the Angler 173F 2012 has the edge at 12 lbs dry weight versus 12 lbs for the Angler 173 Bay 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Angler 173 Bay 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Angler 173F 2012 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Angler 173F 2012 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 0 lbs per hp for the Angler 173 Bay 2011. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Angler 173 Bay 2011 and Angler 173F 2012 share an 7 ft. 5 in. (2.26 m) beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Angler 173 Bay 2011 and Angler 173F 2012?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 3 gallons and 3 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Angler 173 Bay 2011 and Angler 173F 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Angler 173 Bay 2011 and the Angler 173F 2012 are built by Angler. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.