Angler 173 Bay 2007 boat specs
Angler
Angler 173 Bay 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Angler 204FX 2007 boat specs
Angler
Angler 204FX 2007
2007
View full specs →

Angler 173 Bay 2007 vs Angler 204FX 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Angler 173 Bay 2007 vs Angler 204FX 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Angler 173 Bay 2007 measures 17,0 feet overall (2007), giving it roughly 15,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Angler 204FX 2007 at 2,0 feet (2007). At 12 lbs and 22 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Angler 204FX 2007 has a 35-hp advantage over the Angler 173 Bay 2007's 115-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Angler 204FX 2007 carries 65 gallons versus 3 gallons in the Angler 173 Bay 2007. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Angler 204FX 2007 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Angler 173 Bay 2007 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Angler 204FX 2007 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Angler 204FX 2007 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 0 lbs per hp for the Angler 173 Bay 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Angler 204FX 2007 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Angler 173 Bay 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeAngler
MakeAngler
Model173 Bay
Model204FX
Model Year2007
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 5 in
Beam8 ft
Beam - Meters2.26
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches89
Beam - Inches96
Deadrise15℃
Deadrise19℃
Draft [max] - Detail9 in
Draft [max] - Detail14 in
Draft [max] - Meters0.23
Draft [max] - Meters0.36
Draft [max] - Inches9
Draft [max] - Inches14
Weight - Detail1,200 lbs
Weight - Detail2,200 lbs
Weight - kg544.31
Weight - kg997.9
Weight - lbs.12
Weight - lbs.22
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet2
Length - Inches3
Length - Inches4
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Meters5.26
Length overall - Meters6.2
Length overall - Inches207
Length overall - Inches244
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]25 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail30 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail65 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters113.56
Fuel tank capacity - Liters246.05
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Fuel tank capacity - Gal65
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max115 hp
Engine max150 hp
Operational Info
Headnot available
HeadIn console

Angler 173 Bay 2007 vs Angler 204FX 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Angler 173 Bay 2007 or the Angler 204FX 2007?
The Angler 173 Bay 2007 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Angler 204FX 2007 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 15,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Angler 173 Bay 2007 or the Angler 204FX 2007?
For trailering, the Angler 173 Bay 2007 has the edge at 12 lbs dry weight versus 22 lbs for the Angler 204FX 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Angler 204FX 2007 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Angler 173 Bay 2007 tops out at 115 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Angler 173 Bay 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Angler 204FX 2007 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Angler 204FX 2007 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 0 lbs per hp for the Angler 173 Bay 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Angler 204FX 2007 measures 96" wide, compared to 89" for the Angler 173 Bay 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Angler 173 Bay 2007 or the Angler 204FX 2007?
The Angler 204FX 2007 has the bigger tank at 65 gallons, versus 3 gallons on the Angler 173 Bay 2007. That 62-gallon difference translates to roughly 186–310 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Angler 173 Bay 2007 and Angler 204FX 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Angler 173 Bay 2007 and the Angler 204FX 2007 are built by Angler. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.