Amels Dancing Hare 1986 boat specs
Amels
Amels Dancing Hare 1986
1986
View full specs →
VS
Amels Seahorse 1999 boat specs
Amels
Amels Seahorse 1999
1999
View full specs →

Amels Dancing Hare 1986 vs Amels Seahorse 1999 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Amels Dancing Hare 1986 vs Amels Seahorse 1999 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Amels Dancing Hare 1986 measures 189,0 feet overall (1986), giving it roughly 19,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Amels Seahorse 1999 at 170,0 feet (1999). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Amels Dancing Hare 1986 tips the scales at 1 534 000 lbs — 332 000 lbs more than the Amels Seahorse 1999 at 1 202 000 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 1 408 hp, the Amels Dancing Hare 1986 has a 208-hp advantage over the Amels Seahorse 1999's 1 200-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Amels Seahorse 1999 carries 28 002 gallons versus 21 331 gallons in the Amels Dancing Hare 1986. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Amels Dancing Hare 1986 is rated for 57 passengers, while the Amels Seahorse 1999 caps at 51. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Amels Dancing Hare 1986 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Amels Dancing Hare 1986 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 57 passengers and at 189,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Amels Seahorse 1999 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 51 that costs less to run day-to-day.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail189.00 ft
Length overall - Detail170.00 ft
Length - Feet189
Length - Feet170
Length overall - Meters57.61
Length overall - Meters51.82
Length overall - Inches2268
Length overall - Inches2040
Beam30.00 ft
Beam30.00 ft
Beam - Meters9.14
Beam - Meters9.14
Beam - Inches360
Beam - Inches360
Draft [max] - Detail9.80 ft
Draft [max] - Detail11.00 ft
Draft [max] - Meters2.99
Draft [max] - Meters3.35
Draft [max] - Inches118
Draft [max] - Inches132
Displacement1534000.00 lbs
Displacement1202000.00 lbs
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal21331
Fuel tank capacity - Gal28002
Fuel tank capacity - Liters80746.58
Fuel tank capacity - Liters105999.05
Engine makeCaterpillar
Engine makeCummins
Engine model3516 DITA
Engine modelKTA 38M2
Horsepower1408 hp
Horsepower1200 hp
Fuel typeDiesel
Fuel typenot available
Engine 2 Engine MakeCaterpillar
Engine 2 Engine MakeCummins
Engine 2 Engine Model3516 DITA
Engine 2 Engine ModelKTA 38M2
Engine 2 Horsepower1408 hp
Engine 2 Horsepower1200 hp
Engine 2 Fuel TypeDiesel
Engine 2 Fuel Typenot available
Performance
Cruising speed14
Cruising speed12
Cruising speed measureknots
Cruising speed measureknots
Maximum speed15
Maximum speed15.6
Maximum speed measureknots
Maximum speed measureknots
Operational Info
Cabins6
Cabins6
Water capacity5547
Water capacity4623
Boat typePower
Boat typePower

Amels Dancing Hare 1986 vs Amels Seahorse 1999 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Amels Dancing Hare 1986 or the Amels Seahorse 1999?
The Amels Dancing Hare 1986 is the longer of the two at 189,0 feet overall. The Amels Seahorse 1999 comes in at 170,0 feet, making it roughly 19,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Amels Dancing Hare 1986 or the Amels Seahorse 1999?
For trailering, the Amels Seahorse 1999 has the edge at 1 202 000 lbs dry weight versus 1 534 000 lbs for the Amels Dancing Hare 1986. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Amels Dancing Hare 1986 is rated to a maximum of 1 408 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Amels Seahorse 1999 tops out at 1 200 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Amels Dancing Hare 1986 is Coast Guard rated for 57 passengers, while the Amels Seahorse 1999 is certified for 51. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Amels Dancing Hare 1986 and Amels Seahorse 1999 share an 30.00 ft beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Amels Dancing Hare 1986 or the Amels Seahorse 1999?
The Amels Seahorse 1999 has the bigger tank at 28 002 gallons, versus 21 331 gallons on the Amels Dancing Hare 1986. That 6671-gallon difference translates to roughly 20013–33355 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Amels Dancing Hare 1986 and Amels Seahorse 1999 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Amels Dancing Hare 1986 and the Amels Seahorse 1999 are built by Amels. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.