The Amels Apollo 2013 vs Amels Jaz 1997 1997 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Amels Apollo 2013 measures 181,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 17,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Amels Jaz 1997 1997 at 164,0 feet (1997). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Amels Apollo 2013 tips the scales at 1 342 000 lbs — 136 000 lbs more than the Amels Jaz 1997 1997 at 1 206 000 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 1 408 hp, the Amels Apollo 2013 has a 208-hp advantage over the Amels Jaz 1997 1997's 1 200-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Amels Apollo 2013 carries 30 379 gallons versus 25 096 gallons in the Amels Jaz 1997 1997. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Amels Apollo 2013 is rated for 55 passengers, while the Amels Jaz 1997 1997 caps at 49. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Amels Apollo 2013 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Amels Apollo 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 55 passengers and at 181,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Amels Jaz 1997 1997 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 49 that costs less to run day-to-day.