The Amel Super Maramu 1988 vs Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Amel Super Maramu 1988 at 52,6 ft versus Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 at 52,6 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 tips the scales at 35 274 lbs — 7 716 lbs less than the Amel Super Maramu 1988 at 27 558 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 80 hp for the Amel Super Maramu 1988 and 100 hp for the Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 159 gal and 159 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.
Both boats are rated for 16 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 displaces 35 274 lbs — a 7 716-lb difference over the Amel Super Maramu 1988 at 27 558 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.
Both boats draw a similar depth — 6,8 ft and 6,8 ft respectively. Marina access and anchorage options should be broadly equivalent between the two.
For auxiliary power the Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 carries a 100-hp engine against 80 hp on the Amel Super Maramu 1988. Motoring range and ability to punch through a foul current or enter a tight marina under power will favour the more powerful installation.
Hull speed is rated at 8,6 knots for the Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 and 8,6 knots for the Amel Super Maramu 1988.
Bottom line: The Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 35 274 lbs displacement and 53 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Amel Super Maramu 1988 at 27 558 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.