The Amel Sharki 1979 vs Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 measures 52,6 feet overall (2000), giving it roughly 11,6 additional feet of deck space compared to the Amel Sharki 1979 at 41,0 feet (1979). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 tips the scales at 35 274 lbs — 13 889 lbs less than the Amel Sharki 1979 at 21 385 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 100 hp, the Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 has a 50-hp advantage over the Amel Sharki 1979's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 carries 159 gallons versus 90 gallons in the Amel Sharki 1979. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 is rated for 16 passengers, while the Amel Sharki 1979 caps at 12. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 could be the deciding factor.
Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 displaces 35 274 lbs — a 13 889-lb difference over the Amel Sharki 1979 at 21 385 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.
Both boats draw a similar depth — 6,1 ft and 6,8 ft respectively. Marina access and anchorage options should be broadly equivalent between the two.
The Amel Sharki 1979 uses Sloop rigging. For auxiliary power the Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 carries a 100-hp engine against 50 hp on the Amel Sharki 1979. Motoring range and ability to punch through a foul current or enter a tight marina under power will favour the more powerful installation.
Hull speed is rated at 8,6 knots for the Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 and 7,6 knots for the Amel Sharki 1979. For extended cruising, water capacity matters: the Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 carries 264 gallons versus 198 gallons on the Amel Sharki 1979 — a significant advantage on longer passages where watermaker or provisioning stops aren't guaranteed.
Bottom line: The Amel Super Maramu 2000 2000 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 35 274 lbs displacement and 53 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Amel Sharki 1979 at 21 385 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.