Amel Maramu 1978 boat specs
Amel
Amel Maramu 1978
1978
View full specs →
VS
Amel Santorin 1989 boat specs
Amel
Amel Santorin 1989
1989
View full specs →

Amel Maramu 1978 vs Amel Santorin 1989 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Amel Maramu 1978 vs Amel Santorin 1989 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Amel Maramu 1978 at 45,4 ft versus Amel Santorin 1989 at 45,1 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Amel Maramu 1978 tips the scales at 30 865 lbs — 6 614 lbs more than the Amel Santorin 1989 at 24 251 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 60 hp for the Amel Maramu 1978 and 50 hp for the Amel Santorin 1989. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Amel Maramu 1978 carries 127 gallons versus 106 gallons in the Amel Santorin 1989. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 13 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Amel Maramu 1978 displaces 30 865 lbs — a 6 614-lb difference over the Amel Santorin 1989 at 24 251 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.

Both boats draw a similar depth — 6,2 ft and 6,2 ft respectively. Marina access and anchorage options should be broadly equivalent between the two.

For auxiliary power the Amel Maramu 1978 carries a 60-hp engine against 50 hp on the Amel Santorin 1989. Motoring range and ability to punch through a foul current or enter a tight marina under power will favour the more powerful installation.

Hull speed is rated at 8,0 knots for the Amel Maramu 1978 and 7,9 knots for the Amel Santorin 1989. For extended cruising, water capacity matters: the Amel Maramu 1978 carries 285 gallons versus 211 gallons on the Amel Santorin 1989 — a significant advantage on longer passages where watermaker or provisioning stops aren't guaranteed.

Bottom line: The Amel Maramu 1978 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 30 865 lbs displacement and 45 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Amel Santorin 1989 at 24 251 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail45.40 ft
Length overall - Detail45.11 ft
Length - Feet45.4
Length - Feet45.11
Length overall - Meters13.84
Length overall - Meters13.75
Length overall - Inches545
Length overall - Inches541
Beam13.10 ft
Beam13.10 ft
Beam - Meters3.99
Beam - Meters3.99
Beam - Inches157
Beam - Inches157
Draft [max] - Detail6.20 ft
Draft [max] - Detail6.20 ft
Draft [max] - Meters1.89
Draft [max] - Meters1.89
Draft [max] - Inches74
Draft [max] - Inches74
Displacement30865.00 lbs
Displacement24251.00 lbs
Body / Hull
Rudder1 rudder on skeg
Rudder1 rudder on skeg
Helm1 wheel
Helm1 wheel
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal126.8
Fuel tank capacity - Gal105.7
Fuel tank capacity - Liters479.99
Fuel tank capacity - Liters400.12
Horsepower60 hp
Horsepower50 hp
Drive typeinboard
Drive typeinboard
Performance
Maximum speed8.01
Maximum speed7.94
Maximum speed measureknots
Maximum speed measureknots
Operational Info
Water capacity285.3
Water capacity211.3
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail

Amel Maramu 1978 vs Amel Santorin 1989 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Amel Maramu 1978 or the Amel Santorin 1989?
The Amel Maramu 1978 is the longer of the two at 45,4 feet overall. The Amel Santorin 1989 comes in at 45,1 feet, making it roughly 0,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Amel Maramu 1978 or the Amel Santorin 1989?
For trailering, the Amel Santorin 1989 has the edge at 24 251 lbs dry weight versus 30 865 lbs for the Amel Maramu 1978. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Amel Maramu 1978 is rated to a maximum of 60 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Amel Santorin 1989 tops out at 50 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Amel Maramu 1978 is Coast Guard rated for 13 passengers, while the Amel Santorin 1989 is certified for 13. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Amel Maramu 1978 or the Amel Santorin 1989?
The Amel Santorin 1989 has the deeper draft at 6,2 ft, versus 6,2 ft for the Amel Maramu 1978. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Amel Maramu 1978 or the Amel Santorin 1989 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Amel Maramu 1978 at 30 865 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Amel Santorin 1989 at 24 251 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Which is the faster sailboat — the Amel Maramu 1978 or the Amel Santorin 1989?
Based on rated hull speed, the Amel Maramu 1978 has an edge at 8,0 knots versus 7,9 knots for the Amel Santorin 1989. Keep in mind that actual sailing speed depends heavily on wind conditions, sail trim, bottom condition, and skipper experience — hull speed is a theoretical maximum, not a guarantee.
Which boat is better equipped for long-distance cruising?
For extended passages, fresh water capacity is a key indicator of cruising readiness. The Amel Maramu 1978 carries 285 gallons of fresh water compared to 211 gallons on the Amel Santorin 1989 — a meaningful advantage when watermaker installations or port stops aren't guaranteed.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Amel Maramu 1978 and Amel Santorin 1989 share an 13.10 ft beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Amel Maramu 1978 or the Amel Santorin 1989?
The Amel Maramu 1978 has the bigger tank at 127 gallons, versus 106 gallons on the Amel Santorin 1989. That 21-gallon difference translates to roughly 63–105 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Amel Maramu 1978 and Amel Santorin 1989 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Amel Maramu 1978 and the Amel Santorin 1989 are built by Amel. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.