Amel Fango 1985 boat specs
Amel
Amel Fango 1985
1985
View full specs →
VS
Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 boat specs
Amel
Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961
1961
View full specs →

Amel Fango 1985 vs Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Amel Fango 1985 vs Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Amel Fango 1985 measures 32,1 feet overall (1985), giving it roughly 8,9 additional feet of deck space compared to the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 at 23,2 feet (1961). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Amel Fango 1985 tips the scales at 11 023 lbs — 8 377 lbs more than the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 at 2 646 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 tops out at 10 hp. Engine specs for the Amel Fango 1985 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Amel Fango 1985 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Amel Fango 1985 could be the deciding factor.

Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Amel Fango 1985 displaces 11 023 lbs — a 8 377-lb difference over the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 at 2 646 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.

Draft is a practical consideration that many buyers underestimate until they're already at the marina. The Amel Fango 1985 draws 5,2 ft, compared to 3,5 ft for the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961. That 1,7-foot difference affects which anchorages you can access, which haul-out facilities will take you, and how carefully you need to read the tide tables in shallower cruising grounds.

The Amel Fango 1985 uses Sloop rigging. Helm style differs too: the Amel Fango 1985 uses a 1 wheel versus a 1 tiller on the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961. Wheel helms give better leverage and visibility on larger boats; tillers offer direct feedback and simplicity on smaller ones. The Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 has a documented auxiliary engine of 10 hp.

The Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 is trailerable — a genuine advantage for sailors who prefer to keep their boat at home or explore multiple sailing venues. Hull speed is rated at 6,9 knots for the Amel Fango 1985 and 6,1 knots for the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961.

Bottom line: The Amel Fango 1985 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 11 023 lbs displacement and 32 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 at 2 646 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option and is trailerable — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail32.10 ft
Length overall - Detail23.20 ft
Length - Feet32.1
Length - Feet23.2
Length overall - Meters9.78
Length overall - Meters7.07
Length overall - Inches385
Length overall - Inches278
Beam11.20 ft
Beam7.50 ft
Beam - Meters3.41
Beam - Meters2.29
Beam - Inches134
Beam - Inches90
Draft [max] - Detail5.20 ft
Draft [max] - Detail3.50 ft
Draft [max] - Meters1.58
Draft [max] - Meters1.07
Draft [max] - Inches62
Draft [max] - Inches42
Displacement11023.00 lbs
Displacement2646.00 lbs
Body / Hull
Rudder1 rudder on skeg
Rudder1 spade rudder
Helm1 wheel
Helm1 tiller
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal44.9
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters169.96
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Engine 2 Horsepower28 hp
Engine 2 Horsepowernot available
Engine 2 Drive Typeinboard
Engine 2 Drive Typenot available
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower10 hp
Drive typenot available
Drive typeoutboard
Performance
Maximum speed6.93
Maximum speed6.07
Maximum speed measureknots
Maximum speed measureknots
Operational Info
Water capacity79.3
Water capacitynot available
RiggingSloop
RiggingSloop
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail
Trailerablenot available
TrailerableYes

Amel Fango 1985 vs Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Amel Fango 1985 or the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961?
The Amel Fango 1985 is the longer of the two at 32,1 feet overall. The Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 comes in at 23,2 feet, making it roughly 8,9 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Amel Fango 1985 or the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961?
For trailering, the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 has the edge at 2 646 lbs dry weight versus 11 023 lbs for the Amel Fango 1985. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 has a documented max rating of 10 hp. Engine specifications for the Amel Fango 1985 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Amel Fango 1985 is Coast Guard rated for 9 passengers, while the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Amel Fango 1985 or the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961?
The Amel Fango 1985 has the deeper draft at 5,2 ft, versus 3,5 ft for the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Amel Fango 1985 or the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Amel Fango 1985 at 11 023 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 at 2 646 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Can the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 be trailered?
The Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 is listed as trailerable, giving owners the flexibility to launch from any suitable ramp and avoid permanent berthing costs. The Amel Fango 1985 is not listed as trailerable — it will need a marina berth or mooring.
Which is the faster sailboat — the Amel Fango 1985 or the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961?
Based on rated hull speed, the Amel Fango 1985 has an edge at 6,9 knots versus 6,1 knots for the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961. Keep in mind that actual sailing speed depends heavily on wind conditions, sail trim, bottom condition, and skipper experience — hull speed is a theoretical maximum, not a guarantee.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Amel Fango 1985 measures 134" wide, compared to 90" for the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Amel Fango 1985 and Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Amel Fango 1985 and the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 are built by Amel. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.