The Amel 64 2010 vs Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Amel 64 2010 measures 64,4 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 41,2 additional feet of deck space compared to the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 at 23,2 feet (1961). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Amel 64 2010 tips the scales at 85 539 lbs — 82 893 lbs more than the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 at 2 646 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 180 hp, the Amel 64 2010 has a 170-hp advantage over the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961's 10-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Amel 64 2010 is rated for 19 passengers, while the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Amel 64 2010 could be the deciding factor.
Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Amel 64 2010 displaces 85 539 lbs — a 82 893-lb difference over the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 at 2 646 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.
Draft is a practical consideration that many buyers underestimate until they're already at the marina. The Amel 64 2010 draws 7,1 ft, compared to 3,5 ft for the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961. That 3,6-foot difference affects which anchorages you can access, which haul-out facilities will take you, and how carefully you need to read the tide tables in shallower cruising grounds.
Helm style differs too: the Amel 64 2010 uses a 1 wheel versus a 1 tiller on the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961. Wheel helms give better leverage and visibility on larger boats; tillers offer direct feedback and simplicity on smaller ones. For auxiliary power the Amel 64 2010 carries a 180-hp engine against 10 hp on the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961. Motoring range and ability to punch through a foul current or enter a tight marina under power will favour the more powerful installation.
The Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 is trailerable — a genuine advantage for sailors who prefer to keep their boat at home or explore multiple sailing venues. Hull speed is rated at 10,1 knots for the Amel 64 2010 and 6,1 knots for the Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961.
Bottom line: The Amel 64 2010 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 85 539 lbs displacement and 64 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Amel Super Mistral Sport 1961 at 2 646 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option and is trailerable — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.