The Amel 50 2017 vs Amel 55 2012 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Amel 55 2012 measures 56,1 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 6,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Amel 50 2017 at 50,1 feet (2017). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Amel 55 2012 tips the scales at 58 422 lbs — 17 085 lbs less than the Amel 50 2017 at 41 337 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 110 hp for the Amel 50 2017 and 110 hp for the Amel 55 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Amel 55 2012 carries 238 gallons versus 178 gallons in the Amel 50 2017. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Amel 55 2012 is rated for 17 passengers, while the Amel 50 2017 caps at 15. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Amel 55 2012 could be the deciding factor.
Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Amel 55 2012 displaces 58 422 lbs — a 17 085-lb difference over the Amel 50 2017 at 41 337 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.
Both boats draw a similar depth — 7,1 ft and 7,2 ft respectively. Marina access and anchorage options should be broadly equivalent between the two.
The Amel 50 2017 is rigged as a Sloop while the Amel 55 2012 carries Fractional Sloop rigging — a meaningful difference in sail handling complexity, upwind performance, and the size of crew you'll need to work the boat comfortably.
Hull speed is rated at 9,4 knots for the Amel 55 2012 and 9,2 knots for the Amel 50 2017. For extended cruising, water capacity matters: the Amel 55 2012 carries 211 gallons versus 159 gallons on the Amel 50 2017 — a significant advantage on longer passages where watermaker or provisioning stops aren't guaranteed.
Bottom line: The Amel 55 2012 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 58 422 lbs displacement and 56 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Amel 50 2017 at 41 337 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.