Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 boat specs
Alumaweld
Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012 boat specs
Alumaweld
Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012
2012
View full specs →

Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 vs Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a flat Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 against a modified vee Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012 measures 18,3 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 16,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 at 2,0 feet (2010). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012 tips the scales at 1 185 lbs — 1 171 lbs less than the Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 at 14 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 115 hp for the Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 and 115 hp for the Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012 carries 38 gallons versus 3 gallons in the Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012 at 18,3 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 at 2,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumaweld
MakeAlumaweld
ModelFlat Bottom 20 ft
ModelStryker Sport
Model Year201
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam94.5 in. At Chine: 67 in
Beam89 in. At Chine: 72 in
Beam - Meters2.41
Beam - Meters2.26
Beam - Inches94.5
Beam - Inches89
Depth - Detail21 in
Depth - Detail27.5 in
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Centimeters71.12
Depth - Inches21
Depth - Inches27.5
Weight - Detail1,400 lbs
Weight - Detail1,185 lbs
Weight - kg635.03
Weight - kg537.51
Weight - lbs.14
Weight - lbs.1185
Height - DetailSide: 28 in
Height - DetailSide: 29 in
Height - Meters0.71
Height - Meters0.74
Height - Inches28
Height - Inches29
Height [transom]25 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet2
Length - Feet18.25
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Meters6.1
Length overall - Meters5.56
Length overall - Inches24
Length overall - Inches219
Deadrisenot available
Deadrise14℃
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessBottom: 0.160 in. Side: 0.125 in
Hull thicknessBottom: 0.160 in. Side: 0.100 in. Transom: 0.125 in
Hull typeFlat
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail30 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail38 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters113.56
Fuel tank capacity - Liters143.85
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Fuel tank capacity - Gal38
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typenot available
Engine maxProp: 115 hp Jet (Remote and Tiller): 80 hp
Engine maxProp: 115 hp Jet: 80 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,700 lbs
Maximum capacity1,200 lbs
Maximum people5 at 750 lbs
Maximum people5 / 750 lbs

Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 vs Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 or the Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012?
The Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012 is the longer of the two at 18,3 feet overall. The Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 16,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 or the Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012?
For trailering, the Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 has the edge at 14 lbs dry weight versus 1 185 lbs for the Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 measures 95" wide, compared to 89" for the Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 or the Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012?
The Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012 has the bigger tank at 38 gallons, versus 3 gallons on the Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010. That 35-gallon difference translates to roughly 105–175 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 and Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumaweld Flat Bottom 20 ft. 2010 and the Alumaweld Stryker Sport 2012 are built by Alumaweld. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.