Alumacraft VB 1650 AW  Tunnel   2008 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008
2008
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011
2011
View full specs →

Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008 vs Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a flat Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008 against a modified vee Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008 at 16,0 ft versus Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 at 14,3 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008 tips the scales at 485 lbs — 250 lbs more than the Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 at 235 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 40 hp for the Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008 and 20 hp for the Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 comes in at 12 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008 and its 40-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 with its 20-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelVB 1650 AW Tunnel
ModelVs and Ts V-14
Model Year2008
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam74 in
Beam68 in. (1.72 m)
Beam - Meters1.88
Beam - Meters1.73
Beam - Inches74
Beam - Inches68
Weight - Detail485 lbs
Weight - Detail235 lbs. (107 kg)
Weight - kg219.99
Weight - kg106.59
Weight - lbs.485
Weight - lbs.235
Width [transom] - Detail50 in
Width [transom] - Detail62 in. (1.58 m)
Height - Detail22 in
Height - DetailBow: 30 in. (0.76 m)
Height - Meters0.56
Height - Meters0.76
Height - Inches22
Height - Inches3
Height [transom]21 in
Height [transom]20 in. (0.51 m)
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet14.25
Length overall - Detail16 ft
Length overall - Detail14 ft. 3 in. (4.34 m)
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters4.34
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches171
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.102 in
Hull thicknessBottom and Sides: 0.065 in. (1.65 mm)
Hull typeFlat
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max40 hp, 60 hp with optional console and optional floor plan
Engine max20 hp (15 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity770 lbs
Maximum capacity1,195 lbs. (542 kg)
Maximum people5
Maximum people5

Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008 vs Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008 or the Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011?
The Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 comes in at 14,3 feet, making it roughly 1,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008 or the Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011?
For trailering, the Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 has the edge at 235 lbs dry weight versus 485 lbs for the Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008 is rated to a maximum of 40 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 tops out at 20 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 12 lbs per hp compared to 12 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008 measures 74" wide, compared to 68" for the Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008 and Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft VB 1650 AW Tunnel 2008 and the Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-14 2011 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.