Alumacraft V16 2009 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft V16 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009
2009
View full specs →

Alumacraft V16 2009 vs Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a other Alumacraft V16 2009 against a tunnel Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft V16 2009 at 16,0 ft versus Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009 at 17,0 ft. At 28 lbs and 86 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009 has a 50-hp advantage over the Alumacraft V16 2009's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft V16 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009 and its 75-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Alumacraft V16 2009 with its 25-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelV16
ModelVB 1756 AW Tunnel CC
Model Year2009
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam70 in. (1.78 m)
Beam83 in
Beam - Meters1.78
Beam - Meters2.11
Beam - Inches7
Beam - Inches83
Weight - Detail280 lbs. (127 kg)
Weight - Detail860 lbs
Weight - kg127.01
Weight - kg390.09
Weight - lbs.28
Weight - lbs.86
Width [transom] - Detail62 in. (1.58 m)
Width [transom] - Detail56 in
Height - Detail30 in. (0.76 m)
Height - Detail24 in
Height - Meters0.76
Height - Meters0.61
Height - Inches3
Height - Inches24
Height [transom]20 in. (0.51 m)
Height [transom]21 in
Length - Meters5.1
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet17
Length - Inches9
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 9 in. (5.1 m)
Length overall - Detail17 ft
Length overall - Meters5.11
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Inches201
Length overall - Inches204
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessFull Vee Hull-0.065 in. (1.65 mm)
Hull thickness0.102 in
Hull typeOther
Hull typeTunnel
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max25 hp (18 kW)
Engine maxnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail16 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters60.57
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal16
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower75 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,380 lbs. (626 kg)
Maximum capacity1,300 lbs
Maximum people5
Maximum people5

Alumacraft V16 2009 vs Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft V16 2009 or the Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009?
The Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft V16 2009 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft V16 2009 or the Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009?
For trailering, the Alumacraft V16 2009 has the edge at 28 lbs dry weight versus 86 lbs for the Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009 is rated to a maximum of 75 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft V16 2009 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft V16 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft V16 2009. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009 measures 83" wide, compared to 7" for the Alumacraft V16 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft V16 2009 and Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft V16 2009 and the Alumacraft VB 1756 AW Tunnel CC 2009 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.