Alumacraft T14V 2013 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft T14V 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft Waterfowler 16  2008 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008
2008
View full specs →

Alumacraft T14V 2013 vs Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Alumacraft T14V 2013 and the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft T14V 2013 at 14,0 ft versus Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 tips the scales at 525 lbs — 323 lbs less than the Alumacraft T14V 2013 at 202 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 40 hp, the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 has a 25-hp advantage over the Alumacraft T14V 2013's 15-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft T14V 2013 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 comes in at 13 lbs per hp versus 14 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft T14V 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Alumacraft T14V 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelT14V
ModelWaterfowler 16
Model Year2013
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam61 in. (1.52 m)
Beam74 in
Beam - Meters1.55
Beam - Meters1.88
Beam - Inches61
Beam - Inches74
Weight - Detail202 lbs. (92 kg)
Weight - Detail525 lbs
Weight - kg91.63
Weight - kg238.14
Weight - lbs.202
Weight - lbs.525
Width [transom] - Detail60 in. (1.52 m)
Width [transom] - Detail50 in
Height - Detail26 in. (0.66 m) bow
Height - Detail22 in
Height - Meters0.66
Height - Meters0.56
Height - Inches26
Height - Inches22
Height [transom]15 in. (0.38 m)
Height [transom]21 in
Length - Feet14
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail14 ft. (4.2 m)
Length overall - Detail16 ft
Length overall - Meters4.27
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Inches168
Length overall - Inches192
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.060 in. (1.52 mm) bottom 0.050 in. (1.27 mm) sides
Hull thickness0.102 in
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max15 hp (11 kW)
Engine max40 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity825 lbs. (374 kg)
Maximum capacity855 lbs
Maximum people4
Maximum people5

Alumacraft T14V 2013 vs Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft T14V 2013 or the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008?
The Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Alumacraft T14V 2013 comes in at 14,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft T14V 2013 or the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008?
For trailering, the Alumacraft T14V 2013 has the edge at 202 lbs dry weight versus 525 lbs for the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 is rated to a maximum of 40 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft T14V 2013 tops out at 15 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft T14V 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 13 lbs per hp compared to 14 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft T14V 2013. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 measures 74" wide, compared to 61" for the Alumacraft T14V 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft T14V 2013 and Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft T14V 2013 and the Alumacraft Waterfowler 16 2008 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.