Matching a flat Alumacraft Pro 175 2013 against a modified vee Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-16 (20 in.) 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Pro 175 2013 at 17,4 ft versus Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-16 (20 in.) 2011 at 16,6 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Pro 175 2013 tips the scales at 1 075 lbs — 790 lbs more than the Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-16 (20 in.) 2011 at 285 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Alumacraft Pro 175 2013 has a 65-hp advantage over the Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-16 (20 in.) 2011's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-16 (20 in.) 2011 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft Pro 175 2013 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-16 (20 in.) 2011 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft Vs and Ts V-16 (20 in.) 2011 comes in at 11 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Pro 175 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.