Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft Pro 175 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
Alumacraft T14V 2010 boat specs
Alumacraft
Alumacraft T14V 2010
2010
View full specs →

Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 vs Alumacraft T14V 2010 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a flat Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 against a other Alumacraft T14V 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 measures 17,4 feet overall (2011), giving it roughly 3,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Alumacraft T14V 2010 at 14,2 feet (2010). At 1 lbs and 18 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 has a 75-hp advantage over the Alumacraft T14V 2010's 15-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft T14V 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 at 17,4 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Alumacraft T14V 2010 at 14,2 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeAlumacraft
MakeAlumacraft
ModelPro 175
ModelT14V
Model Year2011
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam88 in. (2.24 m)
Beam61 in. (1.54 m)
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Meters1.55
Beam - Inches88
Beam - Inches61
Weight - Detail1,000 lbs. (453.59 kg)
Weight - Detail180 lbs. (82 kg)
Weight - kg453.59
Weight - kg81.65
Weight - lbs.1
Weight - lbs.18
Width [transom] - Detail88 in. (2.24 m)
Width [transom] - Detail60 in. (1.52 m)
Height - DetailSide Height: 23 in. (0.58 m)
Height - Detail26 in. (0.65 m)
Height - Meters0.58
Height - Meters0.66
Height - Inches23
Height - Inches26
Height [transom]21 in. (0.53 m)
Height [transom]15 in. (0.38 m)
Length - Feet17.42
Length - Feet14.17
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 5 in. (5.31 m)
Length overall - Detail14 ft. 2 in. (4.3 m)
Length overall - Meters5.31
Length overall - Meters4.32
Length overall - Inches209
Length overall - Inches17
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters4.3
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessBottom and Sides: 0.102 in. (2.6 mm)
Hull thicknessBottom: 0.060 in. (1.52 mm) Sides: 0.050 in. (1.27 mm)
Hull typeFlat
Hull typeOther
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail21 gal. (79.5 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters79.49
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal21
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max90 hp (67 kW)
Engine max15 hp (11 kW)
Operational Info
StorageBow and Aft Livewells: 20 gal. ea. (75.71 l)
Storagenot available
Maximum capacity1,200 lbs. (544 kg)
Maximum capacity825 lbs. (374 kg)
Maximum people4
Maximum people4

Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 vs Alumacraft T14V 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 or the Alumacraft T14V 2010?
The Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 is the longer of the two at 17,4 feet overall. The Alumacraft T14V 2010 comes in at 14,2 feet, making it roughly 3,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 or the Alumacraft T14V 2010?
For trailering, the Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 has the edge at 1 lbs dry weight versus 18 lbs for the Alumacraft T14V 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 is rated to a maximum of 90 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Alumacraft T14V 2010 tops out at 15 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Alumacraft T14V 2010 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft T14V 2010. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 measures 88" wide, compared to 61" for the Alumacraft T14V 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 and Alumacraft T14V 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Alumacraft Pro 175 2011 and the Alumacraft T14V 2010 are built by Alumacraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.