Matching a modified vee Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2006 against a tunnel Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2006 at 17,0 ft versus Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013 at 18,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2006 tips the scales at 1 245 lbs — 1 153 lbs more than the Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013 at 92 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 140 hp, the Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2006 has a 50-hp advantage over the Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 4 gal and 2 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 9 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.