Matching a modified vee Alumacraft Navigator 165 CS 2006 against a other Alumacraft V14 2008 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Alumacraft Navigator 165 CS 2006 at 16,0 ft versus Alumacraft V14 2008 at 14,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Alumacraft Navigator 165 CS 2006 tips the scales at 965 lbs — 696 lbs more than the Alumacraft V14 2008 at 269 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Alumacraft Navigator 165 CS 2006 has a 70-hp advantage over the Alumacraft V14 2008's 20-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft Navigator 165 CS 2006 comes in at 11 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft V14 2008. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Alumacraft Navigator 165 CS 2006 and its 90-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Alumacraft V14 2008 with its 20-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.