When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2013 and the Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013 are tunnel designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013 measures 18,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 16,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2013 at 2,0 feet (2013). At 74 lbs and 92 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 90 hp for the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2013 and 90 hp for the Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 2 gal and 2 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2013 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Alumacraft MV 2072 AW Tunnel 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Alumacraft VB 1860 AW Tunnel SC 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.